What Is the Speed of a Spacecraft Near Mars?

AI Thread Summary
A spacecraft coasting toward Mars has a speed of 2250 m/s when it is 8500 km from the center of Mars and is expected to reach 3340 m/s when it is 5300 km away. The discussion emphasizes using the work-energy theorem, where the change in potential energy equals the change in kinetic energy. Participants highlight the importance of precise calculations and correcting algebraic errors, particularly in applying gravitational potential energy formulas. The radius of Mars is noted to be irrelevant for the calculations, and the mass of the spacecraft cancels out in the equations. Ultimately, accurate input values are crucial for determining the correct final speed.
bibrahim6
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A spacecraft is coasting toward Mars. The mass of Mars is 6.4 × 1023 kg and its radius is 3400 km (3.4 × 106 m). When the spacecraft is 8500 km (8.5 × 106 m) from the center of Mars, the spacecraft 's speed is 2250 m/s. Later, when the spacecraft is 5300 km (5.3 × 106 m) from the center of Mars, what is its speed? Assume that the effects of Mars's two tiny moons, the other planets, and the Sun are negligible. Precision is required to land on Mars, so make an accurate calculation, not a rough, approximate calculation.

I know the answer is 3340 m/s but i can't seem to get it.
Any help will do
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use work energy theorem.The change in potential energy is equal to change in kinetic energy.
Welcome to forum
 
bibrahim6 said:
A spacecraft is coasting toward Mars. The mass of Mars is 6.4 × 1023 kg and its radius is 3400 km (3.4 × 106 m). When the spacecraft is 8500 km (8.5 × 106 m) from the center of Mars, the spacecraft 's speed is 2250 m/s. Later, when the spacecraft is 5300 km (5.3 × 106 m) from the center of Mars, what is its speed? Assume that the effects of Mars's two tiny moons, the other planets, and the Sun are negligible. Precision is required to land on Mars, so make an accurate calculation, not a rough, approximate calculation.

I know the answer is 3340 m/s but i can't seem to get it.
Any help will do

What have you tried? What equations are relevant (the posting template is there for a reason!). What concepts are involved? We can't help if we can't see where you need help!
 
Ive tried delta K = delta U so 1/2 m(vf-vi)^2 = -G (Mm/(rf-ri)) but i get initial is equal to final since the potential is very small
 
Let's see some numbers. What's the 'per kg' change in potential energy due to moving between the two positions?
 
bibrahim6 said:
Ive tried delta K = delta U so 1/2 m(vf-vi)^2 = -G (Mm/(rf-ri)) but i get initial is equal to final since the potential is very small

Also note that (vf - vi)2 is not the same as vf2 - vi2. The change in kinetic energy is given by ##\frac{1}{2}m (vf^2 - vi^2)##.
 
So this was my attempt

(.5)m( (vf)^2 - (2250)^2 )= -(6.67e-11)* ( (m *6.4 × 1023 ) / (5.3e6 - 8.3e6) )

so m= mass of spacecraft I'm assuming it cancels out and i end up getting
vf= 2250 which is not correct

and does the radius of Mars come into play in this problem?
 
bibrahim6 said:
So this was my attempt

(.5)m( (vf)^2 - (2250)^2 )= -(6.67e-11)* ( (m *6.4 × 1023 ) / (5.3e6 - 8.3e6) )

so m= mass of spacecraft I'm assuming it cancels out and i end up getting
vf= 2250 which is not correct

and does the radius of Mars come into play in this problem?

Your algebra is causing you problems. For the PE change,

$$\frac{GMm}{r_f} - \frac{GMm}{r_i} \neq \frac{GMm}{r_f - r_i}$$

The radius of Mars won't come into play, and yes the mass of the spacecraft will cancel out.
 
I corrected that and ended up getting 3299 m/s...can you lay out an exact equation please I am just not seeing my error
 
  • #10
bibrahim6 said:
I corrected that and ended up getting 3299 m/s...can you lay out an exact equation please I am just not seeing my error

I can't give you the equation, but I can point out errors you make. Why don't you write out the conservation of energy equation in symbols and I'll verify it for you. Then we can look at the numbers.
 
  • #11
Nevermind I put 8.3 instead of 8.5 THANK YOU FOR THE HELP!
 
  • #12
No problem. Glad to help.
 
Back
Top