What is the speed of sound in an alloy with 91.67% gold and 8.33% copper?

  • Thread starter Thread starter I and Me
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Ultrasonic
AI Thread Summary
The speed of sound in a metal alloy composed of 91.67% gold and 8.33% copper is primarily influenced by the gold content, which has a known speed of sound of approximately 3240 m/s. There is no consistent value for the speed of sound in copper provided in the discussion. To calculate the speed of sound in the alloy, one can use the formula v = √(B/ρ), where B is the bulk modulus and ρ is the density of the mixture. The density can be approximated by averaging the densities of gold and copper based on their atomic fractions. Accurate calculations require specific values for both the bulk modulus and density of the alloy.
I and Me
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi there ,
I have been trying to work out what the speed of sound is when passing through a metal alloy made out of 91.67% AU and 8.33% CU.
If anyone here knows,would you care to share, or point me to a place where I can find out ?
Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I and Me said:
Hi there ,
I have been trying to work out what the speed of sound is when passing through a metal alloy made out of 91.67% AU and 8.33% CU.
If anyone here knows,would you care to share, or point me to a place where I can find out ?
Thank you very much
Several sites, e.g., Hypherphysics, have the speed of sound in gold with a value of 3240 m/s. I can't find a consistent value for copper though.

The speed of sound would be dominated by the gold content.

If one can find the bulk modulus and density of the mixture then one can apply a forumla to get an approximate value:

v = √(B/ρ)

Ref: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sound/souspe2.html#c1

One could approximate the density of the mixture using the average determined from the element densities weighted according to atomic fraction.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top