What is the speed of the ball after bouncing off an elastic surface?

  • Thread starter Thread starter emc2_akshay
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In an elastic collision, the speed of the ball after bouncing off a truck can be determined by considering the truck as an inertial reference frame. Since the truck's mass is significantly greater than the ball's, its speed remains effectively unchanged during the collision. The ball's incoming speed, as observed from the truck, is equal to the truck's speed minus the ball's throwing speed. After the collision, the ball's outgoing speed is the same as its incoming speed but in the opposite direction. Finally, to find the ball's speed after the bounce, add the truck's speed to the outgoing speed of the ball.
emc2_akshay
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Excuse me, but will anyone of u be kind enough to help me with this quetion----
Q.==== A truck is moving towards you with a velocity v. You throw a ball at it with velocity x, which bounces of elastically after hittin hthe truck. What is the speed of the ball now?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since no masses are given, this is a conceptiual, not mathematical question. The answer is very simple if you understand a few concepts.

First there is an assumption: the mass of the truck is so much greater than the mass of the ball that the speed of the truck effectively does not change during the collision. So, that means you can "observe" this collision from the point of view of the truck (it's an "inertial reference frame). The elastic collision form the truck's POV, is just like the ball bouncing (perfectly elastically) off a stationary wall.

What is the incoming speed of the ball as seen by the truck? What is the outgoing speed of the ball as seen by the truck? Add to that last speed, the speed of the truck's frame of reference.
 
No, I really do not know to play such note :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile: :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top