What is the Standard State of Carbon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PVnRT81
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Standard State
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying the standard state of carbon between graphite and diamond. It references the enthalpy changes associated with the combustion of both forms of carbon, indicating that graphite has a ΔH of -393.5 kJ/mol while diamond has a ΔH of -393.4 kJ/mol. The speaker applies Hess' Law to determine that converting graphite to diamond requires an energy input of 0.1 kJ/mol, suggesting that graphite is the more stable form due to its lower energy content. The conclusion drawn is that graphite is considered the standard state of carbon. Understanding these energy dynamics is crucial for determining stability in carbon allotropes.
PVnRT81
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Graphite can be change into diamond according to the following equation:

Cgraphite ==> Cdiamond

Consider the following reaction equations:

Cgraphite + O2 (g) ==> CO2 (g) ΔH = -393.5 kJ/mol

Cdiamond + O2 (g) ==> CO2 (g) ΔH = -393.4 kJ/mol

Which form of carbon - graphite or carbon - is considered the standard state of carbon?

2. The attempt at a solution

I tried to use Hess' Law of Summation and determined that to go from graphite to diamond, it takes -0.1 kJ/mol.

To go from diamond to graphite, it takes 0.1 kJ/mol.

I don't know how I can use this information to determine the standard state.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The one with lower energy content is the more stable one.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top