Oxymoron
- 868
- 0
My version of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem is:
Let X be a compact space, and suppose A is a subalgebra of C(X,\mathbb{R}) which separates points of X and contains the constant functions. Then A is dense in C(X,\mathbb{R}).
I can see why the subalgebra would have to separate points (this is how A is dense, no?) but I don't understand HOW it separates points. I mean, isn't A a subalgebra? Which means it is a subset of X and has the same algebraic structure as X.
If this subset, A were to separate points of X, then if I take any pair of distinct points x,y \in X then there must exist a function f \in A such that f(x) \neq f(y).
Oh, I think I just answered this myself! So if the subalgebra did not separate points, then A is never dense in X.
My gripe is, A is a subalgebra of C(X,\mathbb{R}), what is C(X,\mathbb{R})? And why must the subalgebra contain the constant function? What if it didn't contain the constant function?
Let X be a compact space, and suppose A is a subalgebra of C(X,\mathbb{R}) which separates points of X and contains the constant functions. Then A is dense in C(X,\mathbb{R}).
I can see why the subalgebra would have to separate points (this is how A is dense, no?) but I don't understand HOW it separates points. I mean, isn't A a subalgebra? Which means it is a subset of X and has the same algebraic structure as X.
If this subset, A were to separate points of X, then if I take any pair of distinct points x,y \in X then there must exist a function f \in A such that f(x) \neq f(y).
Oh, I think I just answered this myself! So if the subalgebra did not separate points, then A is never dense in X.
My gripe is, A is a subalgebra of C(X,\mathbb{R}), what is C(X,\mathbb{R})? And why must the subalgebra contain the constant function? What if it didn't contain the constant function?