What is the surface gravity on this distant planet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sam2k2002
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the surface gravity of a distant planet with a mass twice that of Earth and a free-fall acceleration that is one-fourth of Earth's. The radius of the planet is given as 1.8 x 10^7 meters, and the mass is approximately 1.19484 x 10^25 kilograms. A participant attempted to calculate the escape velocity but initially arrived at an incorrect value of 94 km/s instead of the correct 9.4 km/s. The calculations involved using gravitational equations, and there was some light-hearted acknowledgment of mistakes made in the process. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities of gravitational calculations and the common errors that can occur.
sam2k2002
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You have been visiting a distant planet. Your measurements have determined that the planet's mass is twice that of Earth but the free-fall acceleration at the surface is only one-fourth as large. Radius = 1.8*10^7meters
Mass = 1.19484 × 10^25 kilograms


Homework Equations


U_g = -(G*M*m)/r
v_escape = sqrt(2GM/r)

The Attempt at a Solution



I just plugged in the variables to the espace velocity equation and get 94km/s, but that's incorrect.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The radius was given in the first part of the problem.
 
Um. The radius and the mass are correct. But I get 9.4km/sec. Check the decimal point.
 
Feldoh said:
g_e = \frac{GM_{e}}{R_{e}}

\frac{1}{4}g_e = g_{distant planet}

\frac{1}{4}*\frac{GM_{e}}{R_{e}} = \frac{G*2M_{e}}{R_{distant planet}}

\frac{1}{4*R_{e}} = \frac{2}{R_{distant planet}}

R_{distant planet} = 8R_{e}

g=G*M/r^2. It's force/mass not potential/mass.
 
Yeah, looks like I was just being retarded
 
Feldoh said:
Yeah, looks like I was just being retarded

S'ok. Reminds me of my post where I was strongly suggesting an OP integrate voltage over a gaussian surface to get enclosed charge. Duh.
 
Dick said:
S'ok. Reminds me of my post where I was strongly suggesting an OP integrate voltage over a gaussian surface to get enclosed charge. Duh.

Lol, guess we all screw up sometimes :smile:
 
Back
Top