What is the temperature of the bath?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lw11011
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Temperature
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the temperature of a liquid bath using the resistance of a gold wire. At 50 degrees Celsius, the wire's resistance is 54 ohms, which increases to 189 ohms in the bath. The temperature coefficient of resistivity is given as 0.0034 (°C)^-1 at 20 degrees Celsius. One participant applies the formula p-po = (po)a(T-To) but arrives at an implausibly high temperature of 785.29 degrees Celsius, suggesting a possible error in calculation. The conversation highlights the complexity of the calculation and the need for careful verification of results.
lw11011
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
At 50 degrees Celsius, the resistance of a segment of gold wire is 54. When the wire is placed in a liquid bath, the resistance increases to 189. The temperature coefficient is 0.0034 (degrees Celsius)^-1 at 20 degrees Celsius.
What is the temperature of the bath? Answer in units of degrees Celsius.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What have you done so far?
 
I tried to use the equation:
p-po = (po)a(T-To)
To= reference temperature
po= resistivity at that temperature
a= temperature coefficient of resistivity

So I did:
189-54 = (54)(0.0034)(T-50)

But I know the answer I got that way is wrong.
 
It sure looks to me like you've got the right equation. Are you sure you solved it correctly?

The form of the equation that I am familiar with is

R = \alpha T

where T is given in degrees Kelvin. But this reduces to your form in either degrees K or degrees C (or F).

Carl
 
When I use the formula I mentioned above, I get T=785.29 degrees Celsius. I don't know if I solved it incorrectly but I did:
189-54=(54)(0.0034)(T-50)
135=(0.1836)(T-50)
735.29=T-50
T= 785.29
 
Sure looks right to me. But that's a mighty hot bath. Maybe a molten salt bath.

Carl
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top