What is the temperature of the CMBR?

  • Thread starter Thread starter photonkid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cmbr Temperature
AI Thread Summary
The temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR) is currently measured at approximately 2.7 degrees Kelvin, a result of the universe's expansion stretching the wavelengths of the radiation. The temperature is determined by analyzing the power spectrum of the CMBR, which fits a black body curve, allowing scientists to infer the temperature based on peak wavelengths. Photon density decreases over time as the universe expands, leading to a reduction in energy per volume, which is consistent with thermal radiation behavior. Despite the observable universe being homogeneous and isotropic, there are discussions about potential undetectable anisotropies and the existence of a "center" to the universe. Overall, the CMBR temperature reflects both current measurements and conditions at the time of its emission, approximately 3000K.
photonkid
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I've read that the temperature of the CMBR is 2.7 degrees K or so and is much cooler than when it started out, due to the expansion of the universe making the wavelength longer.

What is meant by the temperature of the CMBR? How do you measure it? Is it determines purely by the wavelength?

Is the "photon density" a factor in the temperature?

Is the photon density of the CMBR changing over time? i.e. since the "surface of last scattering" is increasing in size, shouldn't the amount of photons that reach us in a given time period be increasing?

The observable universe (including the CMBR) is said to homogeneous and isotropic. Is it possible that the CMBR we see is not actually isotropic but the differences are too small to be detectable and that there actually is a "center" to the universe somewhere, outside the observable universe.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The CMB temperature is affirmed in various ways. One of the more compelling is molecular excitation in the intergalactic medium. We have detected these at great distances and they confirm theoretical CMB temperature projections. See http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.5456, A precise and accurate determination of the cosmic microwave background temperature at z=0.89.
 
photonkid said:
...What is meant by the temperature of the CMBR? How do you measure it? Is it determines purely by the wavelength? ...

Here is a picture of black body radiation curve at various temperatures 3000K, 4000K, 5000K
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Black_body.svg

There is a particular "lopsided bell-curve" shape to power per wavelength distribution curve that you find in the heat glow from a warm or hot object.

Where the PEAK power comes depends on the temperature. You can tell the temperature of a generic dull-finish surface by finding the peak wavelength. The interval of wavelengths where you get the most energy per unit time, the most "wattage".

I think you may know this because you say
How do you measure it? Is it determine purely by the wavelength?

the answer is basically YES, they measure the whole power spectrum, how much wattage in each wavelength bracket. They find they get a PERFECT FIT to the black body curve for a certain temperature, the right peak, the right slopes the right tails, everything fits!

From there it is an easy step to start talking about the "temperature" of the CMB light.

The estimated REDSHIFT z, or let me say the wave stretch factor z+1, is about 1090. Wavelengths and distances have expanded by a factor of 1090 since the light was emitted.

If you divided every wavelength by 1090 and look at the power spectrum then, you see the spectrum of heat glow of an object at about 3000K, like in the diagram.

So the temperature of the gas, when the CMB was emitted, that we are now getting, was about 3000K. And the "temperature of the ancient light" at that time of emission was 3000K.
========
You talk about "photon density". That goes along with this in a consistent way. As distances and wavelengths have expanded by a factor of about 1000, volumes have expanded by a factor of 1,000,000,000. So densities have gone down by a factor of a billion.
It doesn't matter about the area of the "last scattering" increasing. As there get to be more units of area shooting, we get to look like a smaller and smaller target, and it cancels. What matters is that space is filled with a certain density of ancient light, coming from wherever, and as volumes expand the number density of photons declines.

Also the energy of each photon falls off as wavelength increases. So energy per volume falls off as the fourth power of the length scale.

But this is routine. Just how thermal radiation behaves. Energy per volume falls off as the fourth power of temperature. (Temperature is what falls off as the length scale increases)
====
So yes to your question. The temperature of the CMB now (and also the temperature back then when it was emitted from the hot gas) is told from the curve that shows how power is distributed over the range of wavelengths---the so called "spectrum".

You can get a rough idea just from the peak power wavelength bracket. But for more precision they measure and plot the whole curve over many brackets.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top