What is the Threshold for Interband Optical Transitions in a 2D Square Lattice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CAF123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Solid Square
CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87

Homework Statement


A two dimensional solid has two electrons per unit cell and has a Bravais lattice with primitive vectors ##\vec a = \ell \hat x## and ##\vec b = \ell \hat y##. The crystal potential is weak and the solid behaves like a free electron metal.

a)In a reciprocal space diagram, sketch the first Brillouin zone and Fermi contour.
b) Draw an energy band diagram for this solid
c) Estimate the threshold for interband optical transitions in terms of ##\epsilon_f##, the Fermi energy.

Homework Equations


2 electrons per unit cell imply first B.Z fully occupied.

3. The Attempt at a Solution

a) and b) are done I think, I am just wondering really how to begin with c). By interband transition, I think it means we are considering a transition or promotion of an electron in one band to another. It does so by some external means giving it enough energy to overcome the ##\epsilon_f## energy gap. However such a means is not specified.

The diagram in b, given that the crystal potential is weak, shows the fermi energy cutting two bands, so each band is partially filled and conduction can take place. I am just now sure how to begin. If the crystal potential was stronger, the band gap opens and the solid tends toward an insulator.

Many thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, can you show us a picture of your answer to b)?

As to the means, it says "optical". Implying energies in the eV range and negligible momentum transfer.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top