What is the Translational Acceleration at a Point on the Rim at t=10?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of translational acceleration at a point on the rim of a rotating object at a specific time, t=10. Participants clarify that translational acceleration typically refers to the acceleration of the center of mass, contrasting it with rotational acceleration. There is confusion regarding whether to use the formula a=(r)(alpha) or a=(a_t^2+a_c^2)^1/2 to calculate this acceleration. The term "transverse acceleration" is suggested as a possible interpretation, indicating a focus on tangential acceleration. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities in defining and calculating translational acceleration in the context of rotational motion.
studentofphy
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a physics problem that is asking about translational acceleration... it says this:

"What is the magnitude of the translational acceleration at a point on the rim at t=10?"

Is this referring to a=(r)(alpha)

or is it referring to:

a=(a_t^2+a_c^2)^1/2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi studentofphy! :smile:
studentofphy said:
"What is the magnitude of the translational acceleration at a point on the rim at t=10?"

hmm … "translational acceleration" is normally used as being the opposite of "rotational acceleration" …

it applies to a rigid body, and it means the acceleration of the centre of mass, as opposed to the angular acceleration about the centre of mass

i honestly don't see how you apply it to a point :redface:

my guess is that it means "transverse acceleration" (ie "tangential acceleration")

but it could mean the full acceleration (since obviously the angular accelearrtoin of a point about itself is irrelevant)​
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top