What is the trigonometric parallax of a binary system?

AI Thread Summary
The trigonometric parallax of a visual binary system is measured at 0.3749 +/- 0.0057 arcseconds. This measurement represents the parallax across Earth's orbit, similar to that of isolated stars. The +/- value indicates the uncertainty in the measurement, reflecting potential errors in the observation. The discussion clarifies that the parallax does not change based on the distance between the binary stars. Understanding these measurements is crucial for accurate astronomical calculations.
shirin
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi
It is stated that:
"for a visual binary system, the measured trigonometric parallax is 0.3749+/-0.0057 arcsec."
I don't know this angle is parallax of what? I can guess it like this:
0.3749+0.0057 arcsec is the parallax of the whole system when they are at most distance of each other, which looks at a_1 + a_1*e + a_2 + a_2*e and,
0.3749-0.0057 arcsec is the parallax of the whole system when they are at less distance of each other, which looks at a_1 - a_1*e + a_2 - a_2*e.
Is this correct?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's the parallax across the Earth's orbit, just like the parallaxes of isolated stars.
 
and why is it +/-something? Is this related to error?
 
shirin said:
and why is it +/-something? Is this related to error?

Yes. It's a measurement, after all. The uncertainty is being indicated.
 
Thank you!
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top