What is the true relationship between the charges of fundamental particles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter elas
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Particle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of quark charges, specifically the concept that quarks possess fractional charges of 1/3 and 2/3, which are integral to the structure of protons and neutrons. The initial inquiry questions whether these fractional charges are merely theoretical constructs without experimental validation. The response clarifies that the charges are necessary for the mathematical consistency of particle physics, particularly in explaining the composition of protons and neutrons. The conversation acknowledges that while the Standard Model and string theory provide frameworks for understanding particle behavior, they do not address the fundamental causes behind these properties. A participant expresses interest in exploring a new mathematical approach to quark classification that connects mass and charge, indicating a desire to contribute to the ongoing theoretical discourse in a dedicated forum. The discussion concludes with appreciation for the insights shared.
elas
Fundamental particles, electron and quarks; have charges in single units or thirds of a single unit.
Am I correct in believing that these are imaginary numbers and that there is no experimental proof that a 1/3 quark charge is actually 1/3 of the charge of an electron.

I ask this question because my books state that quarks were given there charge originally to fit in with the theory of sub-atomic particles, and this seems to have been accepted because it is not possible to conduct experiments to show the true relationship.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks Janitor, clearly Iwas mistaken.
 
Given the makeup of protons (2 up + 1 down) and neutrons (1 up and 2 down), their charges wouldn't work unless the charges were exactly 2/3 (up) and -1/3 (down). It is a simple linear algebra problem (2 eq. in 2 unknown).
 
It is a simple linear algebra problem (2 eq. in 2 unknown).

Accept that you are correct and thanks for your reply.
My interest lies in doing what neither the Standard Model or string theory can do, that is to explain the underlying cause; that debate has to be conducted in the madhouse (Theory Developement forum).
I am entering a new subject in that forum that I hope you will visit because it refers to a new (mathematical) way of listing quarks that is totally different from current practice in that it links mass and charge together.

Now I have the required answer, I will close this forum with thanks to those who replied, regards, elas.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top