What Is the True Torque and RPM of This DC Motor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the true torque and RPM specifications of a specific DC motor, particularly a Crouzet geared motor. The user seeks a motor capable of delivering 0.1-0.2 Nm torque at 120-200 RPM for a project. There is confusion regarding whether the stated 0.5 Nm torque refers to the motor's input to the gearbox or the actual output torque after gear reduction. Participants clarify that quoted specifications are typically "rated" numbers, which may indicate maximum values but can vary in practical applications. Accurate understanding of these specifications is crucial for selecting the right motor for the project.
mechapeno
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone

For a project I'm currently working on, I need a dc motor which can generate a torque of about 0.1-0.2 Nm (or more) with a rpm of about 120-200.

http://uk.farnell.com/crouzet/82861015/motor-geared-24vdc-430rpm/dp/3115616?Ntt=CROUZET+-+82861015.+-+MOTOR%2C+GEARED%2C+24VDC%2C+430RPM

The geared motor of the above link, (data sheet: http://www.farnell.com/datasheets/30394.pdf) looks promising at first sight, but when you browse some more on farnell.com, you encounter a lot of these 'Crouzet' motors which are priced equally, have the same torque, but different rotational speed.

So, I was wondering: is this 0.5Nm torque the torque the motor delivers as input to the gearbox (so the output torque - after the gearbox has done it's job - is higher/lower) or is this really the applicable torque and rpm for the motor?

Thanks in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
When people quote numbers for devices like that, they almost always are the "rated" numbers. Rated usually, but not necessarily means maximum.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...

Similar threads

Back
Top