What is the Typical Coefficient of Lift for an Aircraft?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BigStelly
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift
AI Thread Summary
The typical coefficient of lift (C_L) for an aircraft varies based on wing design and angle of attack, and is often derived empirically through wind tunnel testing or computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The lift equation, L = C_L (1/2)ρAV², illustrates how C_L is influenced by air density, wing area, and aircraft velocity. For simple wing shapes, C_L can be analytically determined, while more complex designs require numerical methods to account for flow dynamics. Although approximate values for C_L can be estimated, precise calculations necessitate a comprehensive understanding of aerodynamics and the specific flow field around the airfoil. For practical purposes, referencing established airfoil data from sources like NACA and NASA is recommended for accurate lift coefficients.
BigStelly
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Hello All...
I am just wondering about something.

The lift equation is,

L= \frac {C_L \rho A V^2} 2

where C_L= coeficient of lift
\rho= air density
A= area of wingspan
V= velocity of the aircraft

Does anyone have idea on what the typical coeficient of lift is? I know its calculated based on angle of attack and whatnot but does anyone know how this is done? any help greatly appreciated! :smile:

edit: fixed latex
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
BigStelly said:
L= C_L \frac{1}{2}\rho A V^{2}

where C_L= coeficient of lift
\rho= air density
A= area of wingspan
V= velocity of the aircraft

Does anyone have idea on what the typical coeficient of lift is? I know its calculated based on angle of attack and whatnot but does anyone know how this is done?
I think it must be derived empirically. It would depend on the wing design and the way air flows around the wing. That is, I think, why aerospace engineers have wind tunnels. They design a wing and test it to find its lift coefficient. They can then determine how the lift varies as a function of velocity and air density/temperature. Put it this way, would you want to fly in an airplane whose lift coefficient was based on an engineer's calculation or would you prefer one whose lift was determined from testing?

AM
 
I think I read somewhere that a very approximate value for the lift coefficient of a flat plate is

L=1.05*sin(2*a)

where a is the angle of attack (I have to say again that this is just a ballpark figure).

Also, the lift-coefficient can be determined analytically for some very simple wing-shapes. It can be determined with good accuracy using numerical methods for arbitrary shapes. Also, the lift-coefficient is dependent on the reynolds-number (there is more info on reynolds-numbers on www.wikipedia.com).
 
Analytical Derivation for Coeffient of Lift

The lift equation pictured above is used for calculating the lift of a known airfoil under various conditions (an airfoil is by definition the 2-D geometry of a given wing). This is used more for sizing a wing, and not to find the coeffient of lift. The total lift of a particular wing is also affected by the Aspec Ratio, the span of a wing squared divided by the total area.

If you want to determine the Coeffient of lift for a new airfoil, you have to first determine the flow field around the given geometry. Notice: the velocity around the airfoil is a function of the angle of attack. In addition, the velocity immediately over the surface is not the only one that needs to be known, the entire flow field must be defined. There are many vortex and recirculation phenomena which need to be accounted for when designing (or determining the performance of) an airfoil. Once the velocity around the airfoil is known, the pressure over the surface can be found using the Bernoulli equation. This is not a simple exercise. Most aerodynamics courses spend the bulk of their time covering this material.

Wind tunnels are also used, but they are being replaced by Computational Fluid Dynamics, in which the above is calculated on a computer. This is also quite difficult for lay-men, as the average CFD software package is at least $5,000. The software package also have many inherent assumptions about the user, like a thorough understanding of grid generation, aerodynamics, and thermodynamics.

The easiest way to find the coefficient of lift is to look it up, and use a pre-defined airfoil.

If you look up NACA and NASA airfoils, you will find everything you need.
 
Coefficient of lift

Sorry i had ot takemy work off
 
Last edited:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top