MHB What Is the Value of f(2) if f(x) = a^x and f(3) = 64?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goosey00
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To find the value of f(2) for the function f(x) = a^x given that f(3) = 64, first determine the value of a. Since 64 can be expressed as 4^3, it follows that a equals 4. Substituting a back into the function, f(x) becomes 4^x. Therefore, f(2) is calculated as 4^2, which equals 16. The final answer is f(2) = 16.
goosey00
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
If you have f(x)=a^x and f(3)=64 what does f(2)=? Am I over thinking this one? Is it just f(2)=64 also?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: solve for f(x)a^x

goosey00 said:
If you have f(x)=a^x and f(3)=64 what does f(2)=? Am I over thinking this one? Is it just f(2)=64 also?

f(b) means evaluate f(x) at the value b. In this case f(3) means find f(x) when x=3.

Since you have the constant $a$ you can find it's value from f(3) [64 is a cube number so $a$ is a whole number] as an intermediate step. You won't need a calculator for this one but as a hint $64 = 4^3$

  1. Solve $f(3)$ in terms of $a$ by substituting $x=3$ in $f(x)=a^x$
  2. Work out the value of $a$ from the above since you're told that f(3) = 64
  3. Use that value of $a$ to find $f(2) $ by substituting $x=2$
 
Re: solve for f(x)a^x

So it would be 4^2 so f(2)=16? right?
 
Re: solve for f(x)a^x

Yes, since:

$\displaystyle a^3=4^3\,\therefore\,a=4\,\therefore\,f(x)=4^x\, \therefore\,f(2)=4^2=16$
 
Re: solve for f(x)a^x

An equivalent way to do this would be to note that a^2= (a^3)^{2/3}= 64^{2/3}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top