MHB What Is the Value of f(2) if f(x) = a^x and f(3) = 64?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goosey00
  • Start date Start date
goosey00
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
If you have f(x)=a^x and f(3)=64 what does f(2)=? Am I over thinking this one? Is it just f(2)=64 also?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: solve for f(x)a^x

goosey00 said:
If you have f(x)=a^x and f(3)=64 what does f(2)=? Am I over thinking this one? Is it just f(2)=64 also?

f(b) means evaluate f(x) at the value b. In this case f(3) means find f(x) when x=3.

Since you have the constant $a$ you can find it's value from f(3) [64 is a cube number so $a$ is a whole number] as an intermediate step. You won't need a calculator for this one but as a hint $64 = 4^3$

  1. Solve $f(3)$ in terms of $a$ by substituting $x=3$ in $f(x)=a^x$
  2. Work out the value of $a$ from the above since you're told that f(3) = 64
  3. Use that value of $a$ to find $f(2) $ by substituting $x=2$
 
Re: solve for f(x)a^x

So it would be 4^2 so f(2)=16? right?
 
Re: solve for f(x)a^x

Yes, since:

$\displaystyle a^3=4^3\,\therefore\,a=4\,\therefore\,f(x)=4^x\, \therefore\,f(2)=4^2=16$
 
Re: solve for f(x)a^x

An equivalent way to do this would be to note that a^2= (a^3)^{2/3}= 64^{2/3}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top