What is the value of f^{n}(x) when n approaches infinity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions
Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Consider the function defined by
f(x) = 0.6x + 2100

Suppose this function is iterated n times.

Express f^{n}(x) as an elementary function of x.

The problem is actually a simplified version of a finance problem I am trying to solve. I am not sure there is a solution so if a solution does not exist, please help me prove it.

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is straightforward if you iterate a few times.
f2(x) = 0.6(0.6x + 2100) + 2100 = (0.6^2)x + 0.6*2100 + 2100
f3(x) = 0.6((0.6^2)x + 0.6*2100 + 2100) + 2100 = (0.6^3)x + (0.6^2)2100 + 0.6*2100 + 2100
This should be enough to see the general pattern for fn(x).
 
Would this be correct?

f^{n}(x) = .6^{n}x + 3500(.6^{n-1} + .6^{n-2} + .6^{n-3} + ... + .6^{0}) for n>1

BiP
 
Yes, assuming you meant 2100 instead of 3500. It is a linear function of x, which satisfies the elementary function requirement. The constants are just rather large polynomials of 0.6.
 
slider142 said:
Yes, assuming you meant 2100 instead of 3500. It is a linear function of x, which satisfies the elementary function requirement. The constants are just rather large polynomials of 0.6.

Interesting.
What if we make n → ∞ ?

Can we simplify in that case?

My guess is that the answer will be 3500*(\frac{.6}{1-.6}) = 5250.

BiP
 
Bipolarity said:
Interesting.
What if we make n → ∞ ?

Can we simplify in that case?

My guess is that the answer will be 3500*(\frac{.6}{1-.6}) = 5250.

BiP

It should be 3500*(1/(1-0.6)) = 35000/4 = 8750 for the sum of the geometric series. Is 3500 the correct value? You have 2100 in its place in the first post.
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.
Back
Top