What Is the Value of the Line Integral Over a Curve on a Level Surface?

Damascus Road
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Greetings,
I'm having trouble deciding what to do, and in what order for this question:

Suppose F = F( x, y, z ) is a gradient field with F = \nablaf, S is a level surface of f, and C is a curve on S. What is the value of the line integral (over C) of F.dr ?

I think I'm a little confused since there are no values to work with... I'm assuming the level surface of f is referring to \nablaf, meaning that S is a surface of the gradients?

Any help would be appreciated, I'm mighty confused. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They mean that C is contained in a level surface of f. I.e. f(c) is constant for c in C. Dotting grad(f) with a direction vector tells you how fast f is changing in that direction, doesn't it?
 
Ok, someone just explained to me that it is 0, since it's a conservative force.

I was having trouble interpreting S being a level surface of a gradient field, I'm still trying to figure that part out.
 
S is NOT a level surface of the gradient, it's a level surface of f. That's what the question SAID. And there's an even easier reason to say that it's zero (and it's zero even if C isn't closed). What the dot of the gradient vector and the tangent vector to C?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top