What is the Work-Energy Theorem for a Skier Crashing into Netting?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a skier with a mass of 85 kg crashing into netting at a speed of 65 km/h, which is incorrectly converted to 234 m/s instead of the correct 18.06 m/s. The work done by the netting to bring the skier to rest is calculated using the work-energy theorem, yielding approximately 1.5 x 10^5 J. The spring constant of the netting is given as 13,500 N/m, and the distance the netting stretches when the skier comes to rest is determined to be about 0.64 m. The importance of accurate unit conversion is emphasized in the calculations.
kylepetten
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A skier comes crashing into the netting at the bottom of a ski hill. The skier has a mass of 85 kg and is moving at a speed of 65 km/h (234 m/s).

(a) How much work is done by the netting while bringing the skier to rest?
(b) If the "spring" constant for the netting is 13500 N/m, how far is the netting stretched when the skier comes to rest?

m = 85 kg
v1 = 234 m/s
v2 = 0 m/s
k = 13500 N/m
w = ?
[PLAIN]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/f/5/d/f5d889f32d6794e1bc2ed394e9688c76.pngx[/URL] = ?

Homework Equations



(F)(d) = [1/2(m)(v2^2)] - [1/2(m)(v1^2)]
KE = [1/2(m)(v^2)]
PEe = [1/2(k)(x^2)]

The Attempt at a Solution



(a)

W = [PLAIN]http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/f/5/d/f5d889f32d6794e1bc2ed394e9688c76.pngKE[/URL]

= [1/2(m)(v^2)]
= [1/2(85 kg)(234 m/s)^2]
= 2327130
= 2.3 x 10^6 J

This answer seems reasonable.

(b)

Now here is where I need help.

2.3 x 10^6 J = [1/2(k)(x^2)]
2.3 x 10^6 J = [1/2(13500 N/m)(x^2)]
x = sqrt{[-2.3 x 10^6 J]/[1/2(13500 N/m)]}
x = 18 m

Does this look right?
Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
65 km/h ≠ 234 m/s

1h = 3600 s.

Convert it over.
 
rock.freak667 said:
65 km/h ≠ 234 m/s

1h = 3600 s.

Convert it over.

Ahh! I multiplied by 3.6 instead of dividing! Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top