What Is the x Component of the Electric Field at a Point on the x-Axis?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the x component of the electric field at a point on the x-axis due to a charged rod with a non-uniform linear charge density. Participants clarify that the charge density λ varies along the rod and that the electric field must be determined by integrating contributions from infinitesimal charge elements. The correct approach involves using Coulomb's law to find the electric field from a small section of the rod and integrating from -L/2 to L/2. There is confusion about the distance r, which participants confirm should be calculated based on the rod's length and the distance from the point of interest. Ultimately, the integration method is emphasized as necessary for solving the problem accurately.
Broem
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charged rod of length L = 1.00 m lies centered on the x-axis as shown. The rod has a linear charge density which varies according to λ = ax where a = −90.0 μC/m.
What is the x component of the electric field at a point on the x-axis a distance of D = 2.00 m from the end of the rod?

Homework Equations


E=kQ/r^2
charge density = Q/A

The Attempt at a Solution


I really do not understand...Where do I get the r from? Since its not uniformly distributed how can there be any field outside?
Would my r = (D-(half of L))?
I'm assuming lambda is just regular charge density at a location of x?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Broem! :smile:
Broem said:
Would my r = (D-(half of L))?
I'm assuming lambda is just regular charge density at a location of x?

Yes. :smile:

(and of course it's a linear charge density, ie coulombs per metre, not per metre3 :wink:)
Since its not uniformly distributed how can there be any field outside?

Not following you. :confused:
 
Thanks for the quick response!
Ok so here's where I am:

I now know that lambda = Q/L so Q = L * (lambda)

So I'm left with
9e9(-9e-6)/(2-.5)^2

This however is not the correct answer...Where can I go from here?
 
oh, no, you'll have to integrate

use coulomb's law to find the electric field from a tiny section [x,x+dx] (whose charge will be λdx, and which you can assume is concentrated entirely at x), and integrate from -L/2 to L/2 :wink:
 
I got it!
Thank you so much for your help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top