How Is the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Derived?

AI Thread Summary
The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle is derived using the integral version of the Schwarz inequality applied to wavefunctions, leading to the relation ΔxΔp ≥ ℏ/2. The derivation involves understanding the commutator of position and momentum operators, where [x, p] = iℏ. Variance in quantum mechanics is also discussed, emphasizing the relationship between the variances of position and momentum. The derivation can be extended to other non-commuting operators, such as angular momentum. This explanation provides a comprehensive understanding of the principle and its mathematical foundations.
Messages
19,792
Reaction score
10,748
Definition/Summary

One of the most asked questions is concerning how to derive the Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation.

Starting from almost basic concepts of Quantum Mechanics, a derivation is given here. Some details are left as minor exercises for the interested reader.

The derivation on this page is based on the integral version of the Schwarz inequality, applied to wavefunctions.

An alternative derivation, based on the expectation value version, and applied to bras and kets, is on the page "uncertainty principle".

Equations

\Delta x\Delta p \geq \hbar/2

Extended explanation

For understanding this derivation, one might need to pick up results from library items on Schwarz inequality and hermitian operators.

The commutator of two operators A and B is defined as:
\left[ A,B \right] = AB - BA.

Some commutator algebra:
\left[ A,B + C \right] = \left[ A,B \right] + \left[ A,C \right] .
\left[ A,q \right] = 0 , if q is a constant.

The commutator for position and momentum in quantum mechanics (QM) is standard knowledge for a student of QM, thus the result is given here without proof:
\left[ x,p \right] = \left[ x, -i\hbar \frac{d}{dx} \right] = i\hbar .
To prove this, act with this commutator on a test function.

Now let us consider the variance in QM:
(\Delta x ) ^2 = \int \psi^*(\Delta x ) ^2\psi dx
( \Delta x ) = x - <x>
Now we have this very nice relation:
\left[ \Delta x,\Delta p \right] = \left[ x,p\right] = i \hbar, as an exercise, show this.


Now substitute a(x) = A\psi (x) and b(x) = B\psi (x) in the Schwarz inequality:

\int(A\psi)^*(A\psi)dx\int(B\psi)^*(B\psi)dx = <A^2><B^2> \geq \left| \int (A\psi)^*(B\psi) dx \right|^2 = \left| \int \psi^*(A(B\psi)) dx \right|^2

Write:
\int \psi^* AB \psi dx = \frac{1}{2}\int \psi^* (AB+BA) \psi dx + \frac{1}{2}\int \psi^* (AB-BA) \psi dx

We have:
<A^2><B^2> \geq \left| \frac{1}{2}\int \psi^* (AB+BA) \psi dx + \frac{1}{2}\int \psi^* (AB-BA) \psi dx \right|^2 \Rightarrow

Standard algebra: |a+b|^2 \geq |a|^2 + |b|^2
<A^2><B^2> \geq \frac{1}{4}\left| \int \psi^* (AB+BA) \psi dx \right|^2+ \frac{1}{4}\left|\int \psi^* (AB-BA) \psi dx \right|^2

The first term on the right hand side is a number greater than zero (it is equal to the integral I which is real, real number squared is a number greater than zero). So the lower limit is:
<A^2><B^2> \geq \frac{1}{4}\left|\int \psi^* \left[ A,B \right] \psi dx \right|^2

Make substituion A \rightarrow \Delta x and B \rightarrow \Delta p and use the fact that the expectation value of variance is equal to the variance, and that wavefunctions are normalized to unity:

(\Delta x)^2(\Delta p)^2 \geq \frac{1}{4} \left|\int \psi^* \left[ \Delta x,\Delta p \right] \psi dx \right|^2
(\Delta x)^2(\Delta p)^2 \geq \frac{1}{4} (-i\hbar)(i\hbar)\cdot 1 = \hbar ^2/4

Thus:
\Delta x\Delta p \geq \hbar/2

Consider Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle - Derivation (II) for same result obtained in bra-ket notation.

We can also choose to perform this uncertainty with any two operators. It will become interesting if we consider two operators which does not commute. e.g let us consider the angular momentum operators, which have the following commutator:

[ L_x, L_y] = i\hbar L_z

* This entry is from our old Library feature. If you know who wrote it, please let us know so we can attribute a writer. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a great explanation of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle and how to derive it. It is helpful to have the equations, extended explanations, and examples provided. I am looking forward to learning more about this principle and the bra-ket notation mentioned!
 
Thread 'Is there a white hole inside every black hole?'
This is what I am thinking. How much feasible is it? There is a white hole inside every black hole The white hole spits mass/energy out continuously The mass/energy that is spit out of a white hole drops back into it eventually. This is because of extreme space time curvature around the white hole Ironically this extreme space time curvature of the space around a white hole is caused by the huge mass/energy packed in the white hole Because of continuously spitting mass/energy which keeps...
Why do two separately floating objects in a liquid "attract" each other ?? What if gravity is an emergent property like surface tension ? What if they both are essentially trying to *minimize disorder at the interfaces — where non-aligned polarized particles are forced to mix with each other* What if gravity is an emergent property that is trying to optimize the entropy emerging out of spin aligned quantum bits
Back
Top