What Kind of Tensor Product is v=S:∇I?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jure
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
jure
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm reading a book about fluid dynamics and I found some strange product between tensors. It's written like this: v=S:∇I , where S and I are matrices and v is a vector. Symbol : usually denotes Frobenius inner product. In this case we have a product of a matrix with a tensor of rank 3 and the result is vector - so it's not classical Frobenius product.
I would like to know what kind of product this is (especially useful would be index notation).
Thanks for help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jure said:
Hi,
I'm reading a book about fluid dynamics and I found some strange product between tensors. It's written like this: v=S:∇I , where S and I are matrices and v is a vector. Symbol : usually denotes Frobenius inner product. In this case we have a product of a matrix with a tensor of rank 3 and the result is vector - so it's not classical Frobenius product.
I would like to know what kind of product this is (especially useful would be index notation).
Thanks for help.

I would guess a double contraction, which would turn a rank 5 tensor into a vector:<br /> v_i = S_{ijk} \frac{\partial I_k}{\partial x_j}
 
pasmith said:
I would guess a double contraction, which would turn a rank 5 tensor into a vector:<br /> v_i = S_{ijk} \frac{\partial I_k}{\partial x_j}

I initially guessed something like this too, but then thought that

jure said:
S and I are matrices and v is a vector

might indicate that S only has two indices.
 
Maybe something like ##\left( S \cdot \nabla \right) \cdot I## with component form

$$v_k = S_{ij} \frac{\partial I_{ik}}{\partial x_j}?$$
 
George Jones said:
Maybe something like ##\left( S \cdot \nabla \right) \cdot I## with component form

$$v_k = S_{ij} \frac{\partial I_{ik}}{\partial x_j}?$$

Yes, something like this. I and S only have 2 indices. How do you know over which indices to sum? Why wouldn't you sum over i and k instead of i and j?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top