What kinds of divergences for a given interaction

  • Thread starter Thread starter copernicus1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interaction
copernicus1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
Can you look at an interaction term in your lagrangian or hamiltonian, like L_{\rm int} or H_{\rm int}, and say immediately how its diagrams will diverge (as in quartic, quadratic, linear, log, etc.)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The level of divergence depends on the particular diagrams. An interaction term in the Lagrangian is just one vertex that may compose your diagram. For example, in general, diagrams with higher number of loops have higher degree of divergence.

From the interaction term you can usually determine if you theory is renormalizable or not by looking at the dimensions of the coupling. For example, theories with dimensionless couplings are renormalizable.
 
Great thanks. Is there a relationship though between the divergence in the single-vertex interaction and the interactions with higher numbers of vertices? Like, if a single-vertex diagram has a quadratic divergence, would a two-vertex diagram have a quartic divergence?
 
If you assume that your theory only has one kind of interaction vertex then you can always perform a power counting procedure in a general fashion. This procedure clearly depends on you vertex but in order to do that you need to consider:

1) The number of derivatives contained in your vertex
2) The number of internal lines
3) The number of vertices in a given diagram
4) The number of loops
5) The number of external lines

Note that some of these quantities can be related with each other. If you want to see a very neat application of these kind of methods you can look into T. Muta - "Foundation of Quantum Chromodynamics", in particular Ch. 2.5.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top