What Makes a Parachute Safe in Physics?

AI Thread Summary
A parachute is designed to enhance safety by reducing the descent velocity of a person, ensuring a safe landing. The primary mechanism behind this is air resistance, or drag, which counteracts gravitational forces during descent. Additional factors influencing parachute design include political, economic, and environmental considerations, as well as historical advancements in technology and testing methods. Understanding the physics of forces and motion is crucial for grasping how parachutes function effectively. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for a deeper exploration of the principles and history behind parachute safety.
NeKroA
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi there. I am new so I have no idea where to put this. I'd be glad if the moderator can help me put this in the right spot.

So here is my question:

What makes a parachute safe in a physics sense? I need a proper source. I've been looking for this for hours and I couldn't find anything off the net. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NeKroA said:
What makes a parachute safe in a physics sense? I need a proper source. I've been looking for this for hours and I couldn't find anything off the net. Thanks.
What is the function of a parachute?

To provide safey, a parachute must limit the velocity of the person descending through the atmosphere so that person will land on the ground without injury.

How does the parachute accomplish this?
 
Astronuc said:
What is the function of a parachute?

To provide safey, a parachute must limit the velocity of the person descending through the atmosphere so that person will land on the ground without injury.

How does the parachute accomplish this?


Im very to inform you this, but this doesn't help me at all. I know you're trying to say air resistance, but i need more specific and details example. Here are my questions .

1. 1. Which factors or issues (political, economical, environmental, safety) have lead to the development of the device?
2. What is the physics [forces and motion] behind the need for the device?
3. What is the physics [forces and motion] behind the way the device functions?
4. Give an historical perspective of how the device has been redesigned, tested, or refined overtime. (para [ against] chute [fall])
 
NeKroA said:
Im very to inform you this, but this doesn't help me at all. I know you're trying to say air resistance, but i need more specific and details example. Here are my questions .

1. 1. Which factors or issues (political, economical, environmental, safety) have lead to the development of the device?
2. What is the physics [forces and motion] behind the need for the device?
3. What is the physics [forces and motion] behind the way the device functions?
4. Give an historical perspective of how the device has been redesigned, tested, or refined overtime. (para [ against] chute [fall])

If you've come here for answers to your homework, then I'm afraid you're in the wrong place. We do not give "specific and detailed answers" here, and only provide help when the student shows his/her own work/efforts.

If you've been looking for hours on the internet, you must've found something. What information do you have thus far? Is there anything from your textbook or class notes that can help you?
 
cristo said:
If you've come here for answers to your homework, then I'm afraid you're in the wrong place. We do not give "specific and detailed answers" here, and only provide help when the student shows his/her own work/efforts.

If you've been looking for hours on the internet, you must've found something. What information do you have thus far? Is there anything from your textbook or class notes that can help you?


Hi there. I just wanted to know othe than air resistance (drag), what other forces or motions are in behind for the need of parachute. Thanks :P
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top