What Makes the Hilbert Cube Cubelike?

Cincinnatus
Messages
389
Reaction score
0
So, what exactly is "cubelike" about the hilbert cube?

I think I am having trouble "visualizing" it. Is it just called that because it it homeomorphic to I^inf. ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I realize there are different ways of defining the hilbert cube, so this question probably doesn't make much sense.

My class defined it to be the subset of l^2 space given by 0<x_n<1/n (actually less than or equal to).
 
the hilbert cube is the product [0,1]^{\mathbb{N}} with the product topology. if you take the product of just 3 of them it looks like a cube, hence the name. some people like to define it as [0,1] x [0,1/2] x [0,1/3] x ... x [0, 1/n] x ... just because it's easier to work with, but it doesn't really matter since all closed intervals are homeomorphic to [0,1]
 
Last edited:
actually a cube is a product of any closed intervals. someone working in a hilbert space would rather use [0,1] x [0,1/2] x [0,1/3] x ... x [0, 1/n] x ... as the definition since it is isometric, rather than just homeomorphic, to a subspace of itself.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top