What percent of the sky can an astronomer see at one time?

AI Thread Summary
An astronomer at the bottom of a 15m deep, 1m radius well can see a limited portion of the sky due to the well's geometry. The calculations involve determining the solid angle of vision using trigonometric principles, specifically integrating the differential solid angle from the observer's eye level. The maximum angle of view is derived from the height difference between the observer's eyes and the top of the well. For a complete view of the sky over a year, the rotation of the Earth must be considered, affecting the observable solid angle. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of integrating within the constraints of the well's dimensions to calculate the visible percentage of the sky.
charlie05
Messages
128
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


The astronomer fell into the well. The well is circular, depth H = 15m, radius r = 1m. The astronomer has eyes at h = 1.75m. Observation is from the well axis, refraction is neglected.

How many % of sky can an astronomer see at one time?
How many % of sky can an astronomer see during the whole year?

Homework Equations


sine theorem, cosine theorem od sides and angles

The Attempt at a Solution



Bez názvu.png


tg alfa=1/13,25...alfa=0,0013°.
2D well viev...2*alfa=0,0026°

but view is 3D...have I use solid angle? normally an astronomer could see 2π?
 

Attachments

  • Bez názvu.png
    Bez názvu.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 425
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the view is 3D, you should indeed solid angles to calculate the angle of vision. First consider the case were the astronomer is outside the well. In this case, he sees the 100% of the sky (assuming you call 100% seeing the whole half hemisphere on where they're standing). So the solid angle would be ##\Omega=2\pi##.

When the astronomer is at the bottom of the well, he is in a cylinder of height 15 m and radius 1 m and his eyes reach up to 1.75 m (assuming he's looking upwards and at the center of the well). Since the differential solid angle is ##d\Omega=sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi##, you must integrate within the small region of the well that they can see. The integration on ##\phi## is trivial since it goes from ##0## to ##2\pi##, while for ##\theta## you must consider the region they can see from the well.

I cannot draw here, but imagine a triangle rectangle that goes from the eyes of the astronomer to the corners of the well, which has a height of 13.25 m, side of 1 m, and hypothenuse of 13.2877 m. Thus you immediatly see that ##sin\theta_w=1/13.2877## and ##\theta_w=arcsin(1/13.2877)##. So your integration goes from ##0## to ##\theta_w##. Compare it to ##2\pi## and you get the percentage.

As for how much it will see during the year, you must factor the rotation of the Earth and estimate how much the solid angle will change over time. I haven't worked the math on that one, so I'll leave it to you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes charlie05
Thank you very much for your help, this is amazing and I understand it...
 
  • Like
Likes CharlieCW
CharlieCW said:
you must integrate within the small region of the well that they can see
Given the depth to width ratio, probably good enough to consider the area at the top of the well as a flat disc.
 
  • Like
Likes CharlieCW
haruspex said:
Given the depth to width ratio, probably good enough to consider the area at the top of the well as a flat disc.

Indeed, in my answer I'm basically considering the top of the well as a flat disk to find an expression for the angle ##\theta##.
 
CharlieCW said:
Indeed, in my answer I'm basically considering the top of the well as a flat disk to find an expression for the angle ##\theta##.
That was to find the max θ for your integral. You gave the correct formula for the solid angle, which measures the area of the spherical cap.
I am suggesting just taking the area of the flat disc, no integral needed.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Back
Top