What should be a very simple optics question is giving me problems (two lenses)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a GRE optics problem involving two converging lenses and the calculation of the final image location. The initial approach to find the image from the first lens and use it as the object for the second lens led to incorrect conclusions, particularly regarding the treatment of object distances. The correct method involves recognizing the image from the first lens as a virtual object for the second lens, requiring a negative object distance. After reevaluating the calculations, the correct final image location was determined to be 5 cm to the right of the second lens. The participant successfully resolved their confusion by reassessing their approach.
FatCat0
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I'm studying for the GREs, and I ran across this problem:

Object located at x=0
Lens 1 located at x=40cm
Lens 2 located at x=70cm (30cm from lens 1)

f1 = 20cm
f2 = 10cm

Both lenses are converging, thin lenses. So I have to find the final image location.

The understanding I have of multiple lens problems is that you find the image from the first lens and treat that as the object for the second lens. I'm guessing this approach is wrong because it's leading to nonsensical answers:

\frac{1}{f1} = \frac{1}{o} + \frac{1}{i}

\frac{1}{20} = \frac{1}{40} + \frac{1}{i}

\frac{2}{40} - \frac{1}{40} = \frac{1}{i}

40 = i = o' (this is 10 cm to the right of the second lens; on the focal point which means that I'm going to get the second image at x=-infinity)

\frac{1}{f2} = \frac{1}{o'} + \frac{1}{i'}

\frac{1}{10} = \frac{1}{40-30} + \frac{1}{i'}

\frac{1}{10} - \frac{1}{10} = \frac{1}{i'}

i' = infinity

The answer is actually i' = 5 cm to the right of the second lens. I have no idea how to get to this though. Where'd I go amiss?
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
FatCat0 said:
The answer is actually i' = 5 cm to the right of the second lens. I have no idea how to get to this though. Where'd I go amiss?
Since the image is 10 cm to the right of the second lens, it must be treated as a virtual object: Use an object distance = -10 cm (not + 10 cm, which would represent a real object 10 cm to the left of the lens).
 
That fixes the side (thank you), but won't that still result in +infinity as the location of the final image?

Edit: Nevermind, I actually redid it and realized that I jumped the gun. That worked, thanks!
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Simple math model for a Particle Image Velocimetry system'
Hello togehter, I am new to this forum and hope this post followed all the guidelines here (I tried to summarized my issue as clean as possible, two pictures are attached). I would appreciate every help: I am doing research on a Particle Image Velocimetry (PIV) system. For this I want to set a simple math model for the system. I hope you can help me out. Regarding this I have 2 main Questions. 1. I am trying to find a math model which is describing what is happening in a simple Particle...
I would like to use a pentaprism with some amount of magnification. The pentaprism will be used to reflect a real image at 90 degrees angle but I also want the reflected image to appear larger. The distance between the prism and the real image is about 70cm. The pentaprism has two reflecting sides (surfaces) with mirrored coating and two refracting sides. I understand that one of the four sides needs to be curved (spherical curvature) to achieve the magnification effect. But which of the...
Back
Top