What should I be looking for when reading Op-Amps?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BonoEtMalo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building Detector
AI Thread Summary
When reading Op-Amps, focus on key specifications in the datasheets, such as power supply range, gain-bandwidth product, and input offsets. The MAX406AESA and MAX4162ESA are used in a balanced detector circuit, with the MAX406 generating a ground reference and the MAX4162 adjusting outputs based on input voltages. Understanding the suffix letters on part numbers indicates packaging details, while numerical codes often represent batch numbers or manufacturing dates. Resources like "Op Amps for Everyone" by Texas Instruments can provide foundational knowledge for beginners. Familiarity with datasheets and manufacturer websites is essential for effective component selection and understanding circuit functionality.
BonoEtMalo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So my PI suddenly decided she wants me to learn electronics. And so she started me off building a balanced detector. So here I am with this circuit I know nothing about, knowing nothing about electronics...

Anyways, quick question on reading Op-Amps. In my circuit diagram, there are two Op-Amps. They're listed as MAX406AESA and MAX4162ESA. I've looked up their datasheets, but in the reference detector I was given (one that was built a while ago) they used Op-Amps labeled 120-1636H on the visible face of it

How should I go about reading Op-Amps, and what should I be looking for when I see a name like MAX406AESA?

I've attached the circuit diagram if I wasn't clear in my description
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot from 2014-03-03 10:39:05.png
    Screenshot from 2014-03-03 10:39:05.png
    18.5 KB · Views: 557
Engineering news on Phys.org
The battery powered circuit you provide is not an easy one to analyse for a beginner.
There are many small complexities to distract the beginner.
The MAX406 is being used to generate a ground reference at half the battery voltage.

MAX4162 adjusts its output to make it's inputs to be at the same voltage.
The difference in current between Photo Detectors PD1 and PD2 flows through R5, R7 or R8.
Those resistors set the current to voltage conversion gain.
The low impedance op-amp output voltage is proportional to differential PD current.
The circuit output has a series 50 ohm resistor to better drive a coaxial cable.
 
BonoEtMalo said:
they used Op-Amps labeled 120-1636H on the visible face of it

How should I go about reading Op-Amps, and what should I be looking for when I see a name like MAX406AESA?

Often, one chip manufacturing company designs a new part and gives it a number like LT1636, where the "LT" indicates that particular manufacturer. If it is a widely used part, other chip makers will produce equivalent parts, with the same number (1636) but a different manufacturer's prefix. Often, you don't care who made it (so long as it is a reputable company) - you buy the cheapest equivalent that is actually in stock when you want it!

The suffix letters often describe the packaging (physical size and shape, number of pins, packaging material e.g. plastic or ceramic, temperature rating, etc) for the part. Obviously specifying the package type you want is important when you buy a part, but not so relevant for identifying a chip that is already on a circuit board. The data sheet for the chip will show what the suffix letters mean.

Reading the labels on chips is something you learn by experience. Other numerical codes like "120" are often the manufacturer's batch number, or the manufacturing date in coded in some way.
 
That's one heck of an assignment for a beginner.

To your question:

How to learn opamps ?
Texas Instruments has online a wonderful book, "Op Amps for Everyone". A quick Google on that phrase, with SLOD added should turn it up. Print yourself a copy it'll be a lifelong resource.
Sure enuf, http://www.ti.com/lit/an/slod006b/slod006b.pdf

That 1636 opamp might be this one, which looks similar to that Maxim.
http://cds.linear.com/docs/en/datasheet/1636fc.pdf

When reading datasheets look at power supply range, gain-bandwidth product GBW, and input offsets.
Judging by the slow opamps used(200 khz) i'd guess you're decoding a fairly slow optical signal.

Baluncore gave a good circuit analysis.

IF i understand the circuit,,,,
At the modest frequency this thing can reach coaxial cable output seems extravagant, maybe the 51 ohm is to protect against short circuits. We'd have to ask the designer.

Unequal Currents through those two photodiodes cause the second opamp to make up the difference via that RC feedback network C9 and whichever resistor is selected. That turns photodiode current unbalance from light into voltage.

25 picofarads C9 isn't much.
What is this supposed to measure?
I don't think it'll go much above 40 khz. It runs out of opamp bandwidth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
You know what ?

That thing is DC coupled.

Were the two photocells on either side of a vane that's pointed at the sun, it would tell you which one was in the shadow.
That could actuate a motor to make something track the sun.
Is this a solar power experiment?
just curious...

by the way - when looking for opamp datasheets , you can google on the part number.
That produces a zillion hits from annoying middleman sites that are loaded up with advertising and poor copies of datasheets..

I always try to get to the manufacturer's site. You'll learn a lot by reading his application notes.

Maxim is a significant manufacturer of IC's with an informative and educational website. If the part number begins with MAX it's one of theirs.

That's the good and bad of it,,,,,,,

good luck

old jim
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top