Schools What should I study in Grad School

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on choosing between graduate programs in Material Science, Physics, and Electrical Engineering (EE) for someone majoring in Applied Physics with a focus on electronic devices and material properties. The individual expresses a strong interest in Material Science but is concerned about the engineering aspects of the programs, fearing a disconnect from physics. Participants highlight that Material Science often overlaps with physics, especially in research focused on properties of new materials. They note that physics graduates frequently enter materials research, with distinctions between engineering and physics labs based on their research goals. The consensus suggests that pursuing a PhD in Material Science aligns well with the individual's interests, while also emphasizing that a degree in either field allows for flexibility in research focus. The conversation concludes with reassurance that both paths can lead to fulfilling research opportunities.
id the sloth
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
I am currently majoring in Applied Physics and have an interest in electronic devices and material properties. I am applying to grad school in the fall and having trouble deciding between Material Science, Physics, and EE. I am currently leaning towards EE but was wondering if anyone here had any input to help picking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I'm on the same road like id the sloth. Except for the EE.
My field of expertise in the undergraduate level is the physics of materials. So I'm really interested in applying for PhD in Material Science in the US. I'm really confused because some matsci programms come from the school of chemical eng, others from mech eng and others standalone as "School of Material Science & Engineering (MSE).

Most of the MSEs graduate courses offer different courses for those interested in either materials science or materials engineering.
Reading the courses of every school I'm interested led me to think that material science has a lot in common with my courses in physics of materials in my school of appplied physics. But still I'm worried if there is to much engineering in it.. I don't want to be completely separated from physics.

I like the challenge of studiyng the properties of new materials and trying to improve them. Does that put me in the right path or should I look for a PhD in another field?
 
Last edited:
I don't know how helpful my advice can be, but I think you are good for a PhD in Material Science. I think for a degree like Material Science, you can never really be very separated from physics. A PhD in (Applied) Physics focusing on solid state materials/ condensed matter may also be an option for you.

Many people with physics degrees go into materials work. The nature of the research can be different depending on the labs though. Most engineering labs have a purpose in mind when they do research. Something that they can use their research to improve. Physics labs tend to be interested in fundamental properties and explaining things. Of course these categories are not mutually exclusive. And getting a degree in material science does not prevent you from working in a physics lab and vice-versa.

Given that you said that you like the idea of studying new materials and improving them, you could be good with both degrees. I think material science may be better, but I find I am more partial to engineering research. The major does not really prevent you from doing the research you want I think. It's just that doing a materials degree would have you do more material related coursework. Possibly may make finding a nonacademic job easier later too, but don't quote me on that.

I hope this was helpful.
 
Actually it was very helpful indeed. Thanks a lot!
 
Do let me know if you have any other questions. I know exactly what you are going through.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Back
Top