What Steps Are Missing to Solve (2x+5)^(x+1)=729?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the equation (2x+5)^(x+1)=729. A participant attempts to manipulate the equation using logarithms but makes errors in their calculations, particularly in the application of logarithmic properties. Other contributors emphasize the importance of recognizing 729 as a power of 3, specifically 3^6, to facilitate finding the solution. They advise against directly solving the problem for the original poster, instead encouraging a deeper understanding of the algebra involved. The conversation highlights the need for careful mathematical reasoning and verification of steps in problem-solving.
Math100
Messages
813
Reaction score
229
Homework Statement
Solve the equation: (2x+5)^(x+1)=729
Relevant Equations
(2x+5)^(x+1)=729
Homework Statement: Solve the equation: (2x+5)^(x+1)=729
Homework Equations: (2x+5)^(x+1)=729

Here's my work:
(2x+5)^(x+1)=729
x+1=ln(729)/ln(2x+5)
x+1=ln(729/(2x+5))
e^(x+1)=e^ln(729/(2x+5))
e^(x+1)=729/(2x+5)
From here, I don't know what to do. All I know is that the answer is x=2. But I don't know how to get there. Can someone please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is always a good idea to look at what you have!

On the LHS are ##x+1## equal factors. Which factors do you have on the RHS?
 
  • Like
Likes HallsofIvy
Math100 said:
Homework Statement: Solve the equation: (2x+5)^(x+1)=729
Homework Equations: (2x+5)^(x+1)=729

Here's my work:
(2x+5)^(x+1)=729
x+1=ln(729)/ln(2x+5)
x+1=ln(729/(2x+5))
e^(x+1)=e^ln(729/(2x+5))
e^(x+1)=729/(2x+5)
From here, I don't know what to do. All I know is that the answer is x=2. But I don't know how to get there. Can someone please help me?
You do have an error in your workings.
ln(729)/ln(2x+5) is not equal to ln(729/(2x+5)). In general, ##\dfrac{\ln(a)}{\ln(b)} \ne \ln \dfrac a b ## .

Furthermore, I doubt that your approach is likely to give a solution.

To expand slightly on fresh_42's hint: Can you write 729 as some number raised to some other number?
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
Math100 said:
I know is that the answer is x=2. But I don't know how to get there.
Since it is easy enough to check that x=2 is an answer, I assume you are asking how to arrive at that by algebraic steps. The short answer is that you cannot.

To solve a question like that in general, without being given a solution, you need to be a bit creative. First questions should be whether the solution is likely to exist and be unique. In the present case you can check this by considering the ranges over which the function on the left is monotonic and for which of these the result encompasses 729.
Next, you can "binary chop", subdividing ranges to narrow down where solutions should lie.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
##9^3=3^6=3^{2^3}=729##
 
Last edited:
SammyS said:
Not entirely correct.

##3^4=81##, not ##729##.

##9^3=(3\times3)^3=3^6##
You're right -- my mistake -- I edited my post to correct it.
 
sysprog said:
##9^3=3^6=3^{2^3}=729##
New error ##3^6## is correct. ##3^{2^3}## is not correct.

##3^{2^3} =3^8 =6561## ##\ \ne 729##
 
Last edited:
SammyS said:
New error ##3^6## is correct. ##3^{2^3}## is not correct.

##3^{2^3} =19683## ##\ \ne 729##
I guess that's a 'forgetting the rule' error 🤔 -- I meant ##{(3^2)}^3##; too late for me to re-edit, so here's the second corrected version: ##9^3=3^6={(3^2)}^3=729##
 
A reminder @all:

Please do not solve the problem for the OP! Remember that we want to teach, not solve trivial problems. I suppose everybody answering here saw the solution, so there is no need to tell the world the obvious.
 
  • #10
fresh_42 said:
A reminder @all:

Please do not solve the problem for the OP! Remember that we want to teach, not solve trivial problems. I suppose everybody answering here saw the solution, so there is no need to tell the world the obvious.
Sorry -- didn't know I was overdoing it -- I'll be more careful about that.
 
  • #11
##3^{2^3} =3^8 =6561## ##\ \ne 729##

I saw ##19683## in your post, and hit reply to ask how that came about, but when I saw the ##\LaTeX## it said 6561 -- it looked like this: #3^{2^3} =3^8 =6561## ##\ \ne 729#-- I suppose maybe more braces were in order somewhere.
 
  • #12
sysprog said:
##3^{2^3} =3^8 =6561## ##\ \ne 729##

I saw ##19683## in your post, and hit reply to ask how that came about, but when I saw the ##\LaTeX## it said 6561 -- it looked like this: #3^{2^3} =3^8 =6561## ##\ \ne 729#-- I suppose maybe more braces were in order somewhere.
You must have hit the reply button before I edited and re-submitted my post. What I had initially calculated was ##3^{3^2} ## (by mistake), which is ##19683##.
My edited post was submitted about 13 minutes after the initial post.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Likes sysprog
Back
Top