Has What the bleep do we know? sparked controversy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter RAD4921
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the metaphysical movie "What the Bleep Do We Know?" with participants expressing skepticism about its portrayal of quantum physics. Critics label the film as a "New Age propaganda piece" that misrepresents scientific concepts. A notable source, Intuitor, provides a detailed critique, highlighting significant flaws in the movie's claims. Despite some viewers acknowledging a few positive aspects, the overall consensus leans towards disappointment, with many urging others to reference existing threads that have thoroughly debunked the film since its release. The conversation also notes that numerous discussions on this topic have been ongoing since 2004, indicating a long-standing debate within the community.
RAD4921
Messages
346
Reaction score
1
Has anyone seen the metaphysical movie "What the bleep do we know?" I saw it and I have mixed feelings about it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone who knows anything about quantum physics will tell you this movie is Bullsh*t.

http://www.intuitor.com/moviephysics/" wrote a little something about it, calling it “A New Age propaganda piece which purports to teach about quantum mechanics”

It can be found at the bottom of their webpage or http://www.intuitor.com/moviephysics/bleep.html"

Hopefully others will link to some more other good website that debunk this cr@p!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok, ok! There are some rather glaring faults in the movie including the ones Vast referred to on http://www.intuitor.com/moviephysics/bleep.html
Seriously though, are there any redeeming qualities?
 
If you had searched before starting the thread, you would have found at least a dozen threads already debunking the garbage in this movie.
 
Evo said:
If you had searched before starting the thread, you would have found at least a dozen threads already debunking the garbage in this movie.

You seem a little high strung. In any event, I don't use the internet much so I only drop in here from time to time so I failed to see the "dozens" of post you claim were made on the subject.

Though I think the movie had some highlights I wasn't too impressed with it either.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top