What Time Is It? An Exploration of Time Dilations & Relativity

  • Thread starter Thread starter notadoctor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
notadoctor
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What time is it?

I have smart friends. Maybe ya'll can help. I want to know what time it is. Sounds easy doesn't it? But wait, there's more. Things that are moving experience time dilation i.e. observing a ship moving close to the speed of light, while the observer might watch the ship for a year the crew would experience way less time. The faster you go the slower time passes for you. This happens with satellites in orbit as well with gravity. So the Earth revolves around the sun, our solar system revolves around the galactic core, and our galaxy revolves around the universe's center. What is the time for some one standing in the center of the universe?

I'm just an average guy thank you for reading this.

Update: If some thing is stationary, as close to stopped as possible, and has been observing Earth from the beginning of Earth (say 5 billion years-us) how long has the something experienced? Or that previously mentioned something is observing us for an hour to it how long did we experience?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
notadoctor said:
center of the universe
I don't think there is such a thing.
 
The first thing you will have to do is tell what you mean by "the center of the universe"! You see to be under the impression that there is some point "motionless" point you are calling "the center of the universe". The whole point of "relativity" is that there is no such point. You can only talk about speed of an object relative to some other object.
 
notadoctor said:
What is the time for some one standing in the center of the universe?

There is no special point that you can call the center of the universe, so there is no person or place whose time is better or more real or more meaningful than somewhere else.
 
Welcome to PF!

The time is now and the place is here, beyond that we can't say much more.

As you've noticed time is relative to the observer and may be different for different observers. While we know about the motion of the Earth relative to the sun and the sun relative to the galaxy and the galaxy relative to other galaxies, we find there is never an absolute place from which we can measure time.

In that sense then your question while good is quite meaningless.

You can read more about time here though:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time
 
notadoctor said:
The faster you go the slower time passes for you.
Absolutely not true. Others may see you as having as slowed time but for you time passes at one second per second regardless of what others think.

Consider this. You, right now as you read this, are MASSIVELY time dilated according to an accelerated particle at CERN, you are mildly time dilated according to some galaxy 5billion light years from here, and you are not time dilated at all according to the chair you are sitting in. Do you feel slowed down to any of these degrees? Do you feel slowed down to all of them at the same time? That would be a good trick.
 
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
306
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
6K
Replies
103
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Back
Top