What to learn in classical mechanics?How to learn it well?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zergju
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classical
AI Thread Summary
Classical mechanics can be challenging due to its heavy reliance on mathematics, particularly in topics like Lagrangian mechanics. Many learners struggle with applying mathematical concepts to solve problems, such as proving Fermat's law using calculus of variations. It is recommended to strengthen mathematical foundations to better grasp the physics involved. Some participants suggest that books like Thornton's may offer clearer explanations compared to Goldstein's, though opinions on this vary. Overall, focusing on improving mathematical skills is crucial for mastering classical mechanics.
zergju
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am having a course on classical mechanics and find it rather hard..I mean its just too mathematical for me.. I find that lagrangian is mostly about changing coordinates and using formulas... but when I come to doing problems myself i find them quite difficult, like simple problem such as prooving FERMAT's law with calculus of variations.. and so on.. It just seems that I do not know how and where to start
What can I do bout this? is there any recomendation from u guys? any book recommandations?
I just feel that a book by thorton is easier understanding and yet encluding more details than the goldstein one.. am i misjudging?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to say. Generally, you need to develop the math background to understand how the math is being applied in physics. So the advice would be to study the related math and master it.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top