What to learn in pure math for applied math?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on preparing for applied math PhD programs, particularly in areas like mathematical physics, PDEs, and functional analysis. Self-study recommendations include focusing on advanced topics in analysis, such as integration and metric spaces, as well as considering topology, which is beneficial for mathematical physics. Courses in complex analysis, numerical analysis, and differential equations are also suggested to keep options open for various specialties. There's a caution against pursuing mathematical physics if one dislikes studying relativity, although some courses may not require extensive physics knowledge. Overall, a solid foundation in analysis and relevant mathematical concepts is emphasized as essential for success in graduate studies.
creepypasta13
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
So I finished my undergrad last year in applied math and physics. I'm currently applying to applied math phD programs (but they are separate depts from the pure math depts). I don't exactly what I want to focus on, but I was thinking something in mathematical physics, PDEs, functional analysis, and operator theory. Perhaps the program I go to will let me work with a pure math prof doing stuff in string theory

The applied math courses I've taken include proof-based Fourier analysis, linear algebra, and analysis. Also, courses in prob/stats, complex analysis, ODEs, PDEs, dynamical systems, and numerical analysis. So what should I self-study in the meantime? I was thinking topology or the second half of real analysis (integration, metric spaces. Lebesgue, etc).
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been told by three advisor-type people in my department that analysis is absolutely necessary for any math program (and as such, all math majors are required to take one semester). Since most of the math grad programs I've looked at start with a year of analysis study, I'd recommend doing as much of that as possible. Topology is probably a good idea too.
 
It really depends on the area of applied mathematics that you want to work on and taking certain courses will be completely useless in other areas, for example if you want to study string theory then a course such as algebraic topology or non commutative geometry seems good but that has almost no applicability in most other areas. However, there are courses that let you keep your options open. I would recommend any of the following courses, if you have not decided on your specialty yet.

definitely study complex analysis if you have not taken a course in it already.
a second course in partial differential equations
a course in applied nonlinear equations
As many courses as you can in numerical analysis( a good choice is computational methods for PDE's or high-performance scientific computation)
a course in linear programming
a course in combinatorics
maybe a course in control theory

If you are more into mathematical physics then you can take the following courses that don't require serious knowledge of physics.

Differential Geometry
mathematics of Fluid Mechanics
mathematics of Quantum Mechanics
mathematics of Quantum Field Theory
mathematics of General Relativity

If you are interested in theoretical computer science(which is a branch of applied math) you can study,

Computational Complexity Theory,
Advanced Algorithms Design
Automata Theory
Cryptography (cool course! )
Mathematical Logic
Category Theory
Set Theory

If you are interested in mathematical finance:

As many courses in real analysis as possible
As many courses in statistics, probability.
a second course in numerical analysis.
a course in nonlinear optimization
a course in mathematical theory of finance.

BTW, take topology only if you are going into mathematical physics, or you want to do serious
coursework in real analysis, other than that topology has little applicability in other areas.
 
Last edited:
I don't exactly what I want to focus on, but I was thinking something in mathematical physics, PDEs, functional analysis, and operator theory.

If I wanted to do the math of QFT and relativity, I sure hope those don't require much knowledge of physics. I hate studying relativity
 
creepypasta13 said:
I don't exactly what I want to focus on, but I was thinking something in mathematical physics, PDEs, functional analysis, and operator theory.

If I wanted to do the math of QFT and relativity, I sure hope those don't require much knowledge of physics. I hate studying relativity

First of all, I don't think you should go for mathematical physics if you hate studying relativity. After all, all those courses do involve physics.
But I am pretty sure that the courses I listed under mathematical physics don't require any serious knowledge of physics, I myself took General Relativity and did well. The only physics courses I had taken were general physics I and II. The only course requirement for that was introductory differential geometry. Mathematics of QM and QFT require some knowledge of PDE's operator theory and functional analysis and basic probability and again no physics beyond freshman year. Topology is also very helpful in QFT and latter on if you want to study a specialized course in string theory. So I think overall topology is a good idea if you want to go for mathematical physics.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Back
Top