Gerenuk said:
Is it possible to explain that difference in a few sentences? For example can you describe what happens when two electrons interaction via the Couloumb interaction? I mean an explanation that fits into a paragraph
The E,B view of the photon requires the E and B fields to rise an fall together resulting in a violation of conservation of field energy (total energy always includes field energy). But if the E and B are not fields but interaction effects (effective mathematical fields), then a single photon (true) field of a rotational nature (real spin) could effect in the massed particle (simultaneously producing) both an E and B effect. Thus mathematically with a directed rotational field (e.g. a rotating magnetic bar magnet produces a directed rotational field) resulting mathematically with a changing A with time (E= dA/dt) producing the E effect and simultaneously resulting in (B = \nabla A) a B effect where both rise and fall simultaneously as their source is the same (the photon single rotational field)
But the single field produce two effects on the particle making Maxwell's mathematical view of the photon appear to have two fields that rise and fall simultaneously.
Note the single photon field does not change its magnetude and does not violate the conservation of field energy, it is a real (spin) rotational field effect. Note also that now both E and B are velocity dependent effects! E's rotational velocity dependence is hidden by the phenomenological nature (a model of the interaction behaviors, not a model of the interacting particles) of Maxwell's equations.
That the E and B are interaction effects is also indicated by the relationship of the matrix elements of ($F^{uv}$) and the four dimensional gyroscopic field of inertia ($\Omega_{ij}$) which have the same matrix element pattern (G. I. Shipov, ``Theoretical and experimental
research of inertial mass of a four-dimentional gyroscope''). That is to say that the single photon field produces both types of gyroscopic effects in the (real spin) particle's angular momentum, the B field being the traditional gyroscopic reaction at 90 degrees to the spin plane while the E effect is an inplane rotation rate effect.
Gerenuk said:
Not surprised a clever guys notes that.
That is the most important reason why most people at university fail to achieve exceptional results. One should tell them "Stop believing you know it all, start doubting what you've been told, then make up your own universal complete picture."
Yes, and in part believing that mathematics is physics if it produces the correct results.
This along with a lack of fundamental understanding of the phenomenological nature of todays mathematical models which are often only an interaction behavior not the particle behavior, obviates the lack of fundamental clarity, and is an institutionalized problem.
