What Torque Causes Earth's Precessional Cycle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mdewdude
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Precession Torque
AI Thread Summary
The Earth's precessional cycle is caused by the torque exerted by the gravitational forces of the sun and moon on its equatorial bulge, resulting in a precession period of approximately 26,000 years. Calculations for the forces exerted by the sun and moon yield values of 3.53 × 10^22 N and 1.98 × 10^20 N, respectively. However, the initial approach to calculating torque was deemed incorrect, as it did not account for the complexities of tidal forces and angular momentum. Instead, the relevant equation involves the time rate of change of angular momentum, which requires additional information about the Earth's mass quadrupole moments and the angles of precession. Accurate calculations suggest that the combined torque is approximately 3.25 × 10^28 N·m when considering the angular momentum of both the Earth and the celestial bodies.
mdewdude
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Earth's axis of spin precesses just like that of a top or a gyroscope. (This is why the North Star moves away from the north over many centuries.) The cause is the torque on the Earth due to the gravitational pull of the moon and the sun on the Earth's equatorial bulge. The time for a complete cycle of this precession is 2.60×104 years.

How much combined torque do the sun and moon exert on the Earth to cause the observed precession?

Homework Equations


Torque=r*f


3.

To find the combined torque, i had to find the force that the sun exerts on the earth. I did this by finding the gravitational force which was

6.674*10^-11 ((1.9891*10^31 kg)(5.97*10^24kg))/ (149600000 km*1000)^2 the force should equal 3.53 *10^22 N the moon equals out to be 1.98 *10^20


Now i have the forces so i plug it into the equation t=r*f

t= 3.53 *10^22 N *1.49*10^11 m=5.28*10^33

Moon: t= 1.98*10^20 N * 384403000m=7.6*10^28

The combined torque would be 7.6*10^28 + 5.28*10^33 = 5.28*10^33


Am i using the wrong equation to find the force of the moon and sun exerted on the earth?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The formula you are using is for a force f applied off center by a distance r.

Your approach is wrong in that figuring the torque from tidal force is too difficult a problem.
Rather knowing that the torque is inducing a precession i.e. effecting a time rate of change in the angular momentum.

The relevant equation would then be:
\frac{d\vec{L}}{dt} = \vec{\tau} where \vec{L} is the vector angular momentum and \vec{\tau} is the vector torque.

Calculate the angular momentum of the Earth using its angular velocity and the moment of inertia for a spherical mass. Then recall that this is a vector parallel to the axis of rotation. Figure (assuming the angular speed doesn't change) the time rate of change of this vector due to its change of direction. You will need more information, in particular, the angle of the cone in which the Earth's axis precessed.

Otherwise you'll have a nasty vector integration problem using the Moon's and Sun's k/r^2 force integrated throughout the Earth's volume as an ellipsoid. You'll need the amount of bulge and the angle off of the solar and lunar orbit planes and also you'll need to time average over orbits. Just a nasty nasty calculation!

Hmmm... well you can look up the Earth's mass quadrapole moments and the sun's and moons tidal forces to get a good approximation... then time average over the respective orbital periods. Still as the problem reads I would think the best method is to directly figure out the time rate of change of angular momentum.
 
The angular momentum is 2.663 * 10 ^40 kgm2s-1 of the Earth and the sun and the angular momentum of the Earth and moon is 2.88E+34. The angle of the tilt of the Earth is 23.8 degrees. and when i convert the years into seconds i got 8.19*10^11 sec. So after i found the angular momentum., the sun would be (2.663*10 ^40)/8.19 *10^11 sec. That would equal to 3.25 *10^28 so when i add the moon i get a sum value of 3.25 *10^28. I guess I am confused at plugging the proper numbers into the equation
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top