Undergrad What Type of Workbench is Needed for a Press Machine?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the requirements for a workbench to support an electro servo press machine capable of exerting 5 tons (10,000 lb) of force. It is established that the workbench must withstand not only the weight of the press but also the forces generated during operation. The application of Newton's third law is critical, as the forces exerted by the press are contained within its structure, meaning the only force transmitted to the workbench is the weight of the press and the workpiece. Thus, the design of the workbench must account for these factors to ensure stability and safety.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's third law of motion
  • Knowledge of mechanical load distribution
  • Familiarity with electro servo press machines
  • Basic principles of structural engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and load ratings for various workbench materials
  • Explore design principles for supporting heavy machinery
  • Investigate the structural integrity of concrete under compressive loads
  • Learn about the operational mechanics of electro servo presses
USEFUL FOR

Manufacturing engineers, mechanical designers, and anyone involved in the setup and operation of automatic press machines will benefit from this discussion.

JoshKe
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Application of Newtons third law to automatic press machines.
I have recently become interested in automatic press machines, specifically an electro servo model. The press is capable of 5 tons (10,000 lb) of force. My question revolves around understanding what type of workbench I need to put this on top of.

I understand the workbench must at least be able to withstand the weight of the press. My thinking is that the force generated from the ram/servo will transfer to the work material and also through to the bottom of the press. This force will then transfer to the legs of the press, through the workbench, and eventually to the ground. This all from a combination of Newtons third law. Is this true or is the force somehow contained within just the press? If this is true, I feel like the strength of concrete is not enough to handle some pressures onset by say a 20 ton press with small feet.

I feel that there is probably a lot of design that goes into the structure of presses in terms of moments and loads that create stresses in internal members. However, at some point that downward force has to be met by a normal force equal and opposite that eventually comes from the ground otherwise the press would accelerate when an external force or energy(electric motor) is applied.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
JoshKe said:
Summary:: Application of Newtons third law to automatic press machines.

My thinking is that the force generated from the ram/servo will transfer to the work material and also through to the bottom of the press.
So the way a bench press is designed the top part of the press pushes down on the work piece and the bottom part of the press pushes up on the work piece with nearly the same force. So the only force which goes through the bottom of the press to the bench is just the weight of the press and the work piece. If you consider the “system” to be the press and the workpiece together then the upwards and downwards forces are internal and do not affect the bench.
 
A press is similar to a bench vice with two opposed jaws. The force applied by the vice jaws to hold the workpiece, are contained within the vice. The forces applied by a press to the workpiece are contained within the press structure.
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
702
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
17K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K