What units should be used for the cauchy dispersion formula?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the application of Cauchy's dispersion formula for calculating the index of refraction (IOR). The user initially attempts to convert the dispersion coefficient B from micrometers to square meters, leading to confusion about unit conversions. It is clarified that B should remain in micrometers squared when using the formula, as the wavelength is also expressed in micrometers. The correct approach is to ensure both B and the wavelength are in compatible units, confirming that the index of refraction is dimensionless. The conversation emphasizes the importance of unit consistency in calculations involving the Cauchy dispersion formula.
spectral
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

I would like to use the 'cauchy dispersion formula', ie (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy's_equation):[/PLAIN]

eta = A + B / w²

Where :
eta is the resulting IOR
A is the base IOR
B is the dispersion coefficient expressed in squarre meter (m²)
w is wavelength expressed in micro-meters

I try to apply this formula this way :
B = 0.013 in micro-meters,
A = 1.72

So first,
1) I convert the B parameter from micro-meter to m² : B = B / 1000000
2) I convert my wavelenght from nm to micro-meter : wv = 500 / 1000

But the result I got seems incorrect, I got no dispersion !
Maybe there is a problem with my units ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
spectral said:
1) I convert the B parameter from micro-meter to m² : B = B * 1000000

I think you mean to convert B's units from m2 to (μm)2. For that, you have to multiply by 10000002, not 1000000.
 
Thanks for your answer,

But based on the formula here :http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy's_equation[/PLAIN]

the C parameters (I use B instead) is expressed in micro-meters !

So, if C = 0.013 in micro-meters I have to convert it to meters to use the Cauchy formula...
... then I "divide" by 1000000² ?

Or there is something wrong in what I do or my units ?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
By example, I should have :

eta = 1.72 + (0.013 / 1000000²) / 0.500²
 
OK, I see now. I didn't look at the Wikipedia page to see where the numbers came from before.

If your B (their C) is already in units of (μm)2, and you've converted your wavelength λ to μm, then the quantity B / λ2 = 0.013 / 0.52 has units of (μm)2/(μm)2, i.e. it's unit-less, as it should be because the index of refraction is unit-less. Why do you want to convert B to m2?
 
Last edited:
I see...

It is just that I have see somewhere that the C parameter has to be in m²... but it seems false !

Thanks for your help
 
spectral said:
I have see somewhere that the C parameter has to be in m²...

I suspect that they do their calculations using λ in meters.
 
Back
Top