What Value of q Maximizes the Repulsive Force Between Two Charges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaronmilk3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
To maximize the repulsive force between two charges, one with charge +q and the other with charge (Q-q), set up the force equation based on Coulomb's law. Taking the derivative of the force with respect to q and setting it to zero will yield the value of q that maximizes the force. The solution indicates that the optimal charge distribution occurs when Q equals q/2. This approach ensures that the repulsive force is maximized without the need for graphical analysis. The discussion emphasizes the importance of algebraic manipulation and derivative calculation in solving the problem.
aaronmilk3
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Derive your results algebraically… No graphical results.
An excess charge of +Q is distributed into two unequal parts, one having charge +q .
Assume that these two new charges are now separated by a non-zero distance. What value of q maximizes the repulsive electric force that one of these new charges exerts on the other?


I got so far that q and the other one is charged (Q-q) due to the repulsive force. I know I would need to take the derivative but this is where I got lost. Any help would be great! Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aaronmilk3 said:
I got so far that q and the other one is charged (Q-q) due to the repulsive force. I know I would need to take the derivative but this is where I got lost. Any help would be great! Thank you in advance!
You're on the right track. As a matter of fact, it sounds to me like you almost have it already! :smile:

So go ahead and set up your force equation, with one charge q and the other charge (Q - q), separated by some distance.

To maximize a function, take the derivative with respect to whatever variable you wish to vary, and then set the result equal to zero. Solve for the variable (algebra). That's the value of the variable that maximizes or minimizes the function.*

*The answer can give local maxima or local minima. So if you get multiple values (such as in a quadratic), you might wish to do some sanity checking to figure out what each value is. In this particular problem though, you end up with a single maximum (no minimum) so the need for sanity checking doesn't apply here.

The idea behind the procedure is this: When a smooth function rises to the top of its [possibly local] maximum or bottom of its [possibly local] minimum, the slope of the line is zero at this point. So the above procedure is merely finding where the slope of the function equals zero, as the variable changes.
 
yes, right, take the derivative with respect to q (that is d/dq), and solve as above.

you should get Q = q/2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top