What Went Wrong in Calculating the Density of Na Metal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter daviddee305
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Density Metal
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of sodium (Na) metal density using a body-centered cubic unit cell with a length of 4.24 Å. The initial calculation incorrectly assumed there were four Na atoms per unit cell, leading to a density of 2.00 g/cm3, while the correct density is 1.00 g/cm3. The error arose from misunderstanding the arrangement of atoms in a body-centered cubic structure, where there are actually nine atoms per cell, factoring in shared corner atoms. Each corner atom contributes only 1/8th to the unit cell, along with one atom in the center. Clarifying these atomic contributions resolved the confusion in the calculations.
daviddee305
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
1. Calculate the density of Na metal. The length of the body-centered cubic unit cell is 4.24 Å.2. Attempted solution:

[4 Na Atoms/unit cell] * [1 mol Na atoms/(6.022*10^23 atoms)] * [22.99g Na/1 mol Na] = 1.527 * 10-22 g/unit cell

(4.24 Å)3 = 7.6225 * 10-23 cm3/unit cell[1.527 * 10-22 g/unit cell] / [7.6225 * 10-23 cm3/unit cell] = 2.00 g/cm3The correct answer is 1.00 g/cm3... What went wrong in my calculations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
daviddee305 said:
body-centered cubic

[4 Na Atoms/unit cell] …

Hi daviddee305! :smile:

There are 9 atoms in a body-centered cubic cell (1 in the centre, and one at each vertex), but how many cells is each atom in (and why)? :wink:
 
Each corner atom is shared by 8 unit cells, so only (1/8)th of each atom belongs to the body-centered cubic. Plus the one in the middle. Thank you.

That was a great follow-up question, exactly what I needed to see through these confusing diagrams in my text.
 
daviddee305 said:
Each corner atom is shared by 8 unit cells, so only (1/8)th of each atom belongs to the body-centered cubic. Plus the one in the middle. Thank you.

That was a great follow-up question, exactly what I needed to see through these confusing diagrams in my text.

Yup … always go back to the definition. :biggrin:

(And now have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body-centred_cubic. :wink:)
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top