What Went Wrong in My Incline Friction Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving incline friction, where the original poster struggles to identify an error in their solution. Key feedback indicates a misunderstanding regarding the force of the rope, which was incorrectly assumed to equal the weight of the hanging mass. Instead, the correct approach involves defining the rope tension as T and applying Newton's second law to both masses. By combining the resulting equations, one can accurately solve for the acceleration. This clarification is essential for resolving the problem effectively.
houseguest
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hello, this is a physics problem I worked out an cannot determine what I did wrong.
Attached is the problem and my solution. Any help would be very appreciated.
Thanks.

Homework Statement


Attached

Homework Equations



F = ma, f_k = Mu_k * N, dx = v0t + 1/2at^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Attached
 

Attachments

  • prb1.JPG
    prb1.JPG
    44.4 KB · Views: 496
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks to me that you assumed the force of the rope on the mass was equal to the weight of the hanging mass. That's not true. (If it were true, the hanging mass would be in equilibrium.)

Instead, call the rope tension T. Apply Newton's 2nd law to both masses, then combine the equations to solve for the acceleration.
 
Ooooh yeah. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top