What went wrong with my solution for a damped mass spring system?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the damped mass-spring system represented by the differential equation x'' + 10x' + 64x = 0 with initial conditions x(0) = 1 and x'(0) = 0. The user initially derives the general solution as e^(-5t)(c1*cos(6.245t) + c2*sin(6.245t)), but encounters an error in the subsequent calculations. A key correction involves recognizing the need to include the coefficient 6.245 in the derivative calculations, leading to the correct determination of the constants c1 and c2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with initial value problems
  • Knowledge of the method of undetermined coefficients
  • Proficiency in calculus, particularly differentiation and integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of solving second-order linear differential equations with constant coefficients
  • Learn about the application of initial conditions in differential equations
  • Explore the concept of damping in mechanical systems
  • Practice solving similar differential equations using different initial conditions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, physics, and applied mathematics who are working with mechanical systems and differential equations.

FHamster
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
So the equation is x'' + 10x' + 64x = 0
x(0) = 1
x'(0) = 0
I get general solution of e^(-5t)(c1*cos(6.245t) + c2sin(6.245t) )
From there I get e^(-5t)cos(6.245t)+5e^(-5t)sin(6.245t)
but it wrong. What the gerbils am I doing wrong?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi FHamster! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)
FHamster said:
So the equation is x'' + 10x' + 64x = 0
x(0) = 1
x'(0) = 0

From there I get e^(-5t)cos(6.245t)+5e^(-5t)sin(6.245t)
but it wrong. What the gerbils am I doing wrong?

(do hamsters not like gerbils? :biggrin:)

erm :redface: … haven't you left out a 6.245 ? :wink:
 
FHamster said:
So the equation is x'' + 10x' + 64x = 0
x(0) = 1
x'(0) = 0
I get general solution of e^(-5t)(c1*cos(6.245t) + c2sin(6.245t) )
From there I get e^(-5t)cos(6.245t)+5e^(-5t)sin(6.245t)
but it wrong. What the gerbils am I doing wrong?

Thanks
If y= e^{5t}(c_1cos(6.245t)+ c_2sin(6.245t))
then y(0)= e^0 (c_1 cos(0)+ c_2 sin(0))= c_1= 1 so you have that coefficient right.

y'= 5e^{5t}(c_1 cos(6.245t)+ c_2 sin(6.245t))+ e^{5t}(-6.245 sin(6.245 t)+6.245cos(6.245t))

y'(0)= 5e^0(c_1 cos(0)+ c_2 sin(0))+ e^0(-6.245c_1 sin(0)+ 6.245c_2 cos(0))
y'(0)= 5(c_1)+ (1)(6.245c_2)= 11.245
Knowing that c_1= 1, solve for c_2.
 


Thanks, following some of these guidelines and doing some recalcumacations. I managed to get it right

tiny-tim said:
Hi FHamster! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)


(do hamsters not like gerbils? :biggrin:)

erm :redface: … haven't you left out a 6.245 ? :wink:



Hamsters are the masterrace.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
841
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K