What would affect gravity during this experiment?

AI Thread Summary
In a Newton's 2nd Law experiment involving an air track and pulley system, the calculated acceleration of gravity was found to be 9.81540 m/s², yielding a percent error of 0.0550% compared to the standard value of 9.8 m/s². Possible factors affecting this discrepancy include assumptions such as a massless pulley, no friction, and a perfectly horizontal track. The discussion highlights the importance of considering experimental conditions and potential external forces that could influence the results. Additionally, the accuracy of the measurement raises questions about the reliability of the calculated value of g without further geological context. Overall, understanding these variables is crucial for interpreting experimental data in physics.
exparrot
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I did a Newton's 2nd Law experiment for my physics lab. One of the write-up questions asks to identify at least 2 causes why your calculated value of g is not equal to 9.8 m/s2. It also asks to explain how would each cause affect your data and what would make the experimental value bigger or smaller.

So in the experiment, we had set up an air track with a pulley attached to the end of the track. A cart rested on the airtrack, a string was tied to one end of the cart, over the pulley to a 5 gm weighted hanger. To keep the mass constant, 110 gram weights were placed on the cart, and after each run, the weights were transferred to the hanger. Five trials were done.

Calculations from my data gave an acceleration of 9.81540 m/s2 and against the actual value of g, I get a percent error of 0.0550 %. However since I'm suppose to consider why I would not get the same value for acceleration due to gravity, would that be because of some other force, such as tension (which I don't imagine would interfere) or the normal force? I'd appreciate if anyone has some idea(s) and could help me out with this. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't say exactly what you determined with your setup, but I assume it was the acceleration of the cart and from this you got g. I will list some assumptions you probably made, but you have to figure out if they would make any difference to your value of g and in what direction.

1. The pulley is massless.
2. There is no friction on the track or the pulley.
3. There is no air resistance.
4. The track is exactly horizontal.
5. The string is massless.
 
Another point, 9.81540 m/s2 is suspicously accurate - at that level you can't even know the local value of 'g' without doing a geological survey.

Presumably you did the experiment more than once?
Look at the range of the answers.
If you actually got results like, 9.81, 9.80, 9.82, 9.81 for example then your answer would be something like 9.81 +/- 0.1
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top