What would cause a black hole to explode?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of black holes potentially exploding, with references to Lee Smolin's theory that black holes might create new universes rather than simply being singularities. Participants question whether a black hole can explode through mechanisms beyond evaporation, with some suggesting that collisions between black holes could lead to the formation of a larger black hole instead. There is speculation about the implications of black holes in a multiverse context, where singularities could represent creation events for new universes. The conversation also touches on the idea that if the universe were to collapse into a black hole, it might lead to a new Big Bang. Overall, the dialogue explores theoretical scenarios around black holes and their relationship to the universe's origin and fate.
Vast
Messages
284
Reaction score
0
Some physicists have suggested that the big bang might have been a black hole. Lee Smolin for instance has speculated that instead of a singularity, black holes produce new universes. Has Smolin or anyone else for that matter given a process by which a black hole may explode? Apart from evaporation that is.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If I recall correctly, the only thing that can make a black hole explode is another black hole.

I am unsure of the parameters, or the variables involved, but I'd guess they would have to be around the same size. Hmm.

I'm wondering if 1-dimensional singularities (cosmic string) will do the same.
 
Vast said:
Some physicists have suggested that the big bang might have been a black hole. Lee Smolin for instance has speculated that instead of a singularity, black holes produce new universes. Has Smolin or anyone else for that matter given a process by which a black hole may explode? Apart from evaporation that is.
I don't think that Smolin's model requires any black holes to explode (at least from our perspective). As I read his paper, I got the impression that what we consider a singularity in our universe (BH) might be viewed as a creation event from the viewpoint of a theoretical universe on the "other side" of that singularity. A variation on the multiverse theme, with multitudes of universes nested within, yet isolated from, each other by virtue of the BH singularities.
 
Lord Flasheart said:
If I recall correctly, the only thing that can make a black hole explode is another black hole.

I am unsure of the parameters, or the variables involved, but I'd guess they would have to be around the same size. Hmm.

Lord, interesting idea, however as I’ve read the most likely outcome of two black holes colliding will be a new black hole with a larger event horizon. Perhaps gravitational waves produced in such a collision would generate powerful enough distortions to tear apart both holes?
 
turbo-1 said:
I don't think that Smolin's model requires any black holes to explode (at least from our perspective). As I read his paper, I got the impression that what we consider a singularity in our universe (BH) might be viewed as a creation event from the viewpoint of a theoretical universe on the "other side" of that singularity. A variation on the multiverse theme, with multitudes of universes nested within, yet isolated from, each other by virtue of the BH singularities.
Turbo, your right. Smolin’s theory was probably a bad example as it implies that the big bang singularity in our universe is a black hole singularity in another universe, I was thinking along an alternative path where the universe is simply confined to within a black hole at its origin, or something similar such as would be produced if the universe were to collapse. What physical processes then would cause exponential inflation?
 
'IF' the final state of our Universe is a collapse, then all Black Holes will meet and in the final instant of the last ones meeting, our universe will dissappear into a giant Black Hole. With no effect from our universe left, a new Big Bang might occure, until then the interior of a presently existing Black Hole is not a new Big Bang of a new universe, nor a new universe at all. There is one (UNI) universe and although its features might be amazing, they are still part of the unity.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Back
Top