What would happen if we rode on a light beam?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcmagicman530
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Light
mcmagicman530
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Riding on a light beam...

Einstein, i believe, famously wondered what riding on or next to a light beam would be like. I'm just curious, since at the speed of light the time frame collapses, so time ceases to move or exist, would Einstein actually "see" light that was "frozen"? doesn't this violate the uncertainty principle as well??
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In relativity the thought-experiment doesn't exactly make sense, since an object moving at light speed doesn't have its own rest frame so you can't really talk about what it would observer. It might be seen as something more like an attempt at a reductio ad absurdum of other theories which say it should be possible, like the aether model of light. Go here for a good discussion of the history of this thought-experiment and what role it may have played in Einstein's thinking about relativity:

http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/Goodies/Chasing_the_light/index.html
 


In quantum mechanics, the probability amplitude evolves deterministically, so we just treat the electromagnetic wave as a probability amplitude, and it doesn't violate the uncertainty principle. In this view, the typical plane electromagnetic wave doesn't contain a definite number of photons.

For another discussion about how to make sense of the idea that light does not "experience" time, look at posts #24 and after on https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=252523.
 
Last edited:
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...

Similar threads

Replies
26
Views
1K
Replies
51
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top