What would happen if you could blow up a planet for real?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sshai45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet
AI Thread Summary
Blowing up a planet would require an immense amount of energy, specifically more than its gravitational binding energy, which for Earth is approximately 2.25e32 joules. This energy is equivalent to the total output of the Sun over a week. If a hypothetical Dyson sphere could focus all of the Sun's energy onto Earth, the planet would gradually heat up and evaporate, eventually disappearing completely. The visual impact of such an explosion would be dramatic, with the planet undergoing significant changes before its total destruction. Ultimately, the concept highlights the vast energy requirements and catastrophic consequences of planetary destruction.
sshai45
Messages
86
Reaction score
1
Hi.

(Not sure whether this should go in the "science fiction" or "real science" section, since while it's about something often featured in science fiction, I'm asking about real science.)

We've all (well, perhaps not literally _all_, but you get the point) seen those movies where they blow up planets -- Star Wars, etc. But what'd happen if one could do that for real? If one had a way to generate an enormous amount of energy in a beam form and shoot an Earth-like planet with it -- with enough to blow it up? What would the explosion actually look like?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To totally destroy a planet (i.e. not just chip tiny bits off that could fall back down or go into orbit) you need to put in more energy than the gravitational binding energy of that planet. For Earth that is ~2.25e32J which is about the amount of energy the Sun puts out in a week.

If we propose an unobtanium Dyson sphere that reflects all the Sun's output onto the Earth then over the course of a week you would see the Earth heating up and evapourating until nothing is left.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top