What would the volume of an object be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Realityguy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
AI Thread Summary
To displace 2 gallons of water, the volume of the object must also be 2 gallons, equivalent to approximately 0.007570 cubic meters. However, determining the dimensions of the object is complex, as it depends on the object's shape and density. The original question is criticized for being fundamentally flawed, as it does not specify the object's density or structure. Without this information, calculating specific dimensions is not feasible. Ultimately, while the volume is clear, the lack of detail makes the question unsolvable in practical terms.
Realityguy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If you wanted to displace 2 gallons of water, what would the volume of the object need to be?

From there, what would the dimensions of an item need to be to match the required volume?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
The question itself leaves much to think about as the displacement of water requires something of equal weight, not of equal volume. Therefore, the question itself has some fundamental flaws.
 
the answer is 2 gallons
 
Yes the "gallon" is a unit of volume. The dimensions of the object would depend on the shape of your object. If you really can't figure this one out yourself maybe you should reconsider going into the field of physics. 2 gallons is equivalent to 0.007570 cubic meters. From there it should not be very difficult to get your dimensions.
 
That is not exactly correct stongio. The question, as I've said, has some fundamental flaws. The question asks for the dimensions of "an item" of unknown density and structure. As such, it cannot really be solved. The answer '2 gallons' simply does not do the question justice.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top