Whats a good uC family for DSP and analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Topher925
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Dsp
AI Thread Summary
A user is seeking a microcontroller capable of advanced signal processing and mathematical operations, moving away from low-end development tools. They are considering PICs, particularly higher-end dsPICs and PIC32s, due to their support and familiarity. ARM processors and Atmel's 32-bit processors are also under consideration, with a preference for options that support 5V. The user highlights Atmel's AVR32 for its free development tools, DSP library, and powerful features, including USB programming and Linux kernel support. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for a capable microcontroller that balances performance and cost.
Topher925
Messages
1,562
Reaction score
7
In the not to distant future I'm going to require a microprocessor that can handle a good amount of signal processing and a lot of mathematical operations. Currently, all the development tools I have used are low end beginner stuff and are no where near capable of doing these things I need. So I figured I'd start from square one by learning an entirely new chip that's more than advanced enough for what I need so I'll have room to grow into it in the future.

I mostly have been looking at PICs since they are so well supported and I have programmed the 12Fs years ago. uChip also has a 25% discount for students. I'm thinking some of the higher end dS pics with USB or maybe even the PIC32s. I've also been looking at the ARMs but a lot of them use 3.3v which really bugs the crap out of me.

Can anyone give me some suggestions on what family I should go with or look into?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Analog devices, and Texas instrument

something like this maybe?

http://www.analog.com/en/embedded-processing-dsp/blackfin/BF518-EZBRD/processors/product.html
 
Another option might be to look at some FPGA development boards. I recently started using a NI DAQ that has an on-board Xilinx FGPA and I must say I was surprised at how powerful it is; even when programmed using Labview...
So something like the Spartan starter kit might also be worth a look.
 
waht said:
something like this maybe?

I guess I should have specified that I'm looking for more of a microcontroller and not a microprocessor. I think something like BlueFin would be a little overkill for my applications anyway.

So something like the Spartan starter kit might also be worth a look.

The CE/EE department at school love these things. I think to really take advantage of an FPGA though you need to be able to program in VHDL which I really know nothing about.

I've been looking at maybe using some of Atmels 32-bit processors and having a second look at the ARMs. I've used Cordiumcorp's ARMmite before and it seems like might be what I'm looking for once I get rid of the Basic compiler even though the chip is only sort of 5v tolerant.

I like the fact that Atmel provides their development studio and GCC compiler absolutely free while MicroChip and others do not ($900 for MicroChips C32 Compiler :eek:).
 
I think I found my next chip to learn. Atmel's AVR32 seems like it fits the bill pretty well. It includes a DSP library, all the development tools are free, plus its really powerful and has lot of cool features like being able to be programmed directly from USB. It can even support operating systems so it can support a linux kernal. The chips are very well priced too.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Back
Top