MHB What's the best strategy to solving this Integral in 3 minutes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lorena_Santoro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Strategy
AI Thread Summary
To solve the integral of cos^3(2x), it is effective to separate it into (cos^2(2x))cos(2x) and use the identity cos^2(2x) = 1 - sin^2(2x). A substitution of u = sin(2x) simplifies the integral, leading to du = 2cos(2x)dx, which allows for the transformation of cos(2x)dx into (1/2)du. The integral then evaluates to (1/2)∫(1 - u^2)du from 0 to sin(8), resulting in the expression sin(8) - (sin^3(8)/3). This method demonstrates a clear strategy to solve the integral efficiently within a limited time frame.
Lorena_Santoro
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Please do not double post here, either.

-Dan
 
Separate cos^3(2x) as (cos^2(2x))cos(2x)= (1- sin^2(2x))cos(2x). Now use the substitution u= sin(2x) so that du= 2cos(2x)dx, cos(2x)dx= (1/2)du. When x= 0, u= sin(0)= 0 and when x= 4, u= sin(8). The integral becomes $$\frac{1}{2}\int_0^{sin(8)}(1- u^2)du=\left[u- \frac{u^3}{3}\right]_0^{sin(8)}$$$$= sin(8)- \frac{sin^3(8)}{3}$$.
 
$x = \dfrac{\pi}{4} \implies \text{ upper limit }, u= 1$
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, and thank you!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top