What's the Best Term for Damaged Nuclear Fuel Handling?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the handling of damaged nuclear fuel aboard the Lepse maintenance vessel, which contains spent fuel assemblies in poor condition, including broken parts and spilled fuel. Participants are debating the appropriate terminology for the broken fuel components, questioning whether to refer to them as "debris" or "spillage." Additionally, there is a discussion on the correct term for the equipment used to remove these assemblies, with options being "retrieval equipment" or "unloading equipment." The Lepse is noted to contain spent fuel from the Lenin icebreaker, which experienced accidents leading to the damaged fuel. The conversation emphasizes the need for specialized equipment for safe retrieval and disposition of the damaged fuel.
Jack8rkin
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!
Anybody deals with nuclear waste?
I got a question about the maintenance vessel Lepse, which is fully loaded with radwaste.
Here is a link:
http://www.bellona.org/english_import_area/about_bellona/33320
There are many cases (or tubes) containing one spent fuel assembly each, as well as caissons (basically tube-like containers) filled with several damaged fuel assemblies each.
The assemblies are in bad condition and, as I understand, some parts are broken off of them, some fuel is spilled.

1. What would you call the things that are broken off the FAs, including nuclear fuel?
Is it "debris" or "spillage"?

2. What would you call the eqipment to remove the fuel assembleis from the ship?
Is it "retrieval equipment" or "unloading equipment"?

Please, share your experience.

Thank you
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Apparently Lepse contains spent fuel from the Lenin icebreaker.
http://www.bellona.org/english_import_area/international/russia/civilian_nuclear_vessels/icebreakers/30131

Lenin had 3 PWRs producing 90MW. The assemblies are likely relatively small, but probably of high burnup (which means a lot of fission products).

Apparently there were "two accidents onboard the nuclear powered icebreaker Lenin. The first took place in February 1965, when Lenin was undergoing repairs and refuelling. The vessel sustained severe mechanical damages to the fuel assemblies, some of which were broken in two pieces, and were detected during the unloading of fuel from reactor number two. About 95 spent nuclear fuel assemblies were transferred to the nuclear service ship Lepse and unloading was halted after that. "

So Lepse contains 'damaged fuel'. Ostensibly, it would require special 'fuel handling' equipment to retrieve and safely disposition the fuel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top